A Follow Up to the “Virus” Challenge: 7/27/22 Dr. Tom Cowan Webinar With Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Mike Stone, and Mike Donio

Yesterday, I had the absolute pleasure and honor of being on Dr. Tom Cowan’s Wednesday webinar to discuss a follow-up on the No “Virus” Challenge. We addressed a paper that was supplied by Steve Kirsch and Co. as the “irrefutable evidence” for the existence of “SARS-COV-2.” The paper, a June 2022 non peer-reviewed preprint written by Dr. Sin Lee, is nothing but meaningless genomic data based on a fraudulent “SARS-COV-2” genome from January 2020. For some reason, the Fan Wu paper supplying the original fraudulent genome was not presented as “irrefutable evidence.” Also discussed are cyro-EM images said to be considered evidence of live “virus.” Please watch the webinar and find out why neither the genomic data nor the EM images constitute “irrefutable evidence” of a “virus” that was never purified and isolated.

Live Webinar With Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Mike Stone, and Mike Donio – Recorded on July 27th, 2022

In this webinar, along with Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Mike Stone & Mike Donio, we discussed the Virus Challenge in further detail.
We also reviewed the following article by Sin Hang Lee, which can be found here: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202206.0192/v1

Follow along for more Virus Challenge updates at: https://drtomcowan.com/pages/the-virus-challenge

Watch here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/rekrHZ52IKZy/

92 comments

  1. After hearing Dr. Lee’s answers, or rather non-answers, my dwindling faith in all things etched in stone by the medical mafia is further confirmed. This guy is a medical specialist? Give me a break.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I am no longer interested in the so-called Human Sciences, nor the so-called Religions of the World, because I have understood that God cannot be known through the teachings of religions and that the true knowledge of our world is not in the teachings of the official human sciences. We are born intelligent so we only need sincerity of soul and efforts of objective thinking to find out what is the reality in which we live. In reality, the microscope and the telescope did not bring any kind of beneficial contribution to our life, but only opened the way to more lies and deceptions but also to more dirty desires and to more very bad deeds.

    Like

    1. Nike

      Thanks, that’s a great and true comment in all respects with the sole exception of the “god” assignation: “god” implies a direct, definitive knowing about the creator that is, in truth, impossible. “god” is the idolatrous, religious lie.

      I would only add that in addition to microscopes and telescopes, any tool that enables us to systematically abuse our local ecologies are tools that did not bring any beneficial contributions to our lives, because ‘our’ lives are a seamless continuum with our descendants, and whatever abuses we mete-out we meet out on ‘them’ too.

      Like

  3. That sure was a devastating response to Sin Hang Lee’s “irrefutable evidence.” I didn’t realize before that he was the one who told Cowan and Kaufman that there wasn’t enough virus to detect either in an individual, or 2 people together, or…. going up to 10,000 before he stopped talking. Lee’s paper is based upon circular reasoning and flawed methodology, including the reduction of virology to sequencing vs actually finding, isolating and purifying a virus, the use of both the flawed PCR test and flawed Sanger sequencing, making for a process which for one thing misses the possibility of non-coding RNA being sucked in by the process. Dr Cowan also debunked Richard Fleming’s claim of virus proof via electron microscopy

    Liked by 1 person

      1. Seriously, you need to do a compilation vid from all your interviews with others, plus Cowan saying it ….it would be hilarious …great promotion of your blog

        Liked by 1 person

  4. Watching this now! I liked your comments at the beginning about how their strategy is to simply exclude all that “hard stuff” like isolating a virus. lol Let’s just skip to the sequencing, which is really assembling, as I understand it. Kind of like buying a Lego kit that has some pieces missing, but oh well, I will just assemble it via my computer and call the IMAGE real!!!!!!!! Or buying just the image of the kit but not all the right parts….. something like that.
    Not the best analogy, but you get my point.

    I would love to hear more about the details of the assembling process. Devil is in the details. That’s why this debunking process is SO important.

    THEY should be offering up details of these processes, obviously. It should be given clearly to the general public exactly how virology works. This point isn’t made often enough. The general public absolutely deserves to know in detail how virology really works. WE should be the “peer” in peer review. Otherwise, the black magic pseudoscience proliferates in a “culture” (ha) of denial, ignorance, and confusion. And fear, lots of fear. Fear does not make a healthy culture. It makes for stress and turns the rational mind, and the intuitive mind (common sense) OFF. Scientific methodology should be transparent, freely offered, clearly presented, and discussed publicly. No more secrets and lies. Academia can suck it — it will have to change, and radically. All of this has to change, how we know what we know needs to be openly discussed… and do we really know it is true? “Is it true, and how do we know it is true?” is a meditative question. There aren’t easy answers. Modern science wants it easy. Like just skipping to the genetics and molecular toys etc. Logic and reason and common sense aren’t easy, the ego is challenged. We need to challenge the ego, that will be the NEW science, and it’s going to be challenging for us all.

    I was with my sister on a trip and saw in the back of her car a bunch of National Geographic magazines. One had on the cover, “The Mystery of Viruses” (and of course an IMAGE of a mystery virus!) I was tempted to look at the article, but didn’t want to go into a state of complete disgust while at the beach, lol. So I just ignored it. YEAH it’s a mystery alright! Accurate title, actually. Sigh.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks Carolyn! I didn’t really get everything I wanted to say out as the nerves got to me, but it was great to be involved! It would be awesome if virology was transparent but they keep everything hidden behind “proprietary information” and “competitive edge.” It is nothing but a nontransparent scam designed to confuse and frustrate those who want to look behind the curtain. The genomics thing is crucial to get to the bottom of as it is being pushed as the ultimate (indirect) proof now. I hope to devote more time in the future breaking genomics down further. 🤞

      Like

      1. Yeah, so we have a for-profit business model (not that there is anything inherently wrong with profit or business) driving the business of virology. So what’s the problem with that, Carolyn? Are you a socialist? Lol. No, just pointing out that the world is in the clutches of a field of study that wants to stay in business. Seems like a lot of other businesses have to divulge how they make things, what the ingredients are, etc.

        I don’t know, I am no expert on these matters, but we all know that virology is what the entire edifice of this “pandemic” is built upon. Yet it is beyond real investigation. Nothing suspicious in that!

        It relates to what Kaufman was saying in the video about manufacturing being the driving force behind the genetics being adopted as a central tool in virology, and so readily. It’s a business model, not a “let’s get healthier and search for truth” model. It’s divorcing science from the pursuit of knowledge. But we are TOLD it is the best model for encouraging truth seeking! It’s supposed to create incentive, ya know! Money doesn’t corrupt, it creates incentive…..lol.

        But behind the technology, the manufacturing, the money, the status, the careers….behind all of that lies a deeply held belief that “tiny, mindless, but very crafty critters” are floating in the air and can invade us and replicate themselves and cause terrible disease. That’s the premise, the assumption, the STORY, and they are sticking with it. That deeply held belief is the real driver of all of this, and it’s a deeply felt fear.

        And, I think, behind that belief is another even more deeply held belief. The really deep one says:. “I am vulnerable to outside forces. Shit happens. Randomly. Life happens AGAINST me, not FOR me. Life happens TO me, not THROUGH me. I don’t create my experience, I am a victim of outside influences (influenza!). My behavior, choices, thoughts, feelings, emotional state….it can all be trumped by “mostly dead”, invisible-to-the-eye (and even technology, for this belief was cemented in long before they CLAIMED to see viruses) micro-level bad guys. Those guys are BAD and WAY stronger than me, way smarter to –despite being “mostly dead”, which only makes them insanely smart, like the evildoers on the Saturday morning cartoons.”. That’s the crazy belief lurking behind all of this, although I could use more sophisticated language to describe it, lol.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Brilliantly said Carolyn! 👏 Virology is indeed a business looking to keep itself alive and profitable. I remember reading a few years ago that in the late 70’s, the CDC was close to having to shut down as there were no major “viruses” and it was losing funding. Fortunately, HIV/AIDS came out right in the nick of time and saved them. 😉

        As you said, these are for-profit companies that have no desire to put themselves out of business nor uncover the truth. Unless exposed, we will continue to get the next flavor of the week “virus.” It seems every day there is a new story of a “virus” popping up, whether it’s nipah, adenovirus, strawberry hepatitis, tomatoe flu, etc.that they are keeping an eye on. They must keep us believing in the lie so that we continue to feed the system.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. (Not sure if I am replying to your reply or starting a new comment thread… but anyway….) Regarding your comment on a “new flavor” of viruses being put on the market (and it is a market!) all the time…. that would be a great blog post in and of itself. I think you are one of the few who is tracking all these “new flavors”! I mean, just listing them all (using your tried-and-true method of simply using their words to expose their fraud) would be amazing to see. The names, dates, the descriptions…. over all these decades. If it was all presented in this way, SOME people might wake up the MARKETING scam.

        Liked by 1 person

  5. Here’s why so few scientists are interested in learning the truth about viruses.

    NIH grapples with rush to claim billions in pandemic research funds

    “For the second time in just over 10 years, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is scrambling to hand out billions of dollars in emergency research funding and scientists are rushing to get a piece of the action. . .”

    https://www.science.org/content/article/nih-grapples-researchers-rush-claim-billions-pandemic-research-funds

    Liked by 1 person

  6. No one has ever produced direct, uninterpretable and repeatable evidence to show, beyond any doubt, that atoms and molecules really exist, that they have the characteristics described by so-called physicists and chemists, and that they do exactly what so-called physicists and so-called chemists claim to do.

    And, precisely because there is no direct, uninterpretable and repeatable evidence of the existence of atoms and molecules… the so-called scientific teachings of an atomistic and molecular nature are nothing but scams.

    So there is no kind of atomistic-molecular physics and no kind of atomistic-molecular chemistry… all these pseudo-sciences still remain at the level of alchemy.

    As for the sub-microscopic areas of biology… the scam is complete and utter.

    In reality, the level of human knowledge is insignificant and is limited almost exclusively to the visible domain.

    So, by running an infinite number of random experiments, so-called scientists have only managed to find out and record some of the effects of manipulating materialized energy and non-materialized energy… but without ever being able to understand why things happen as it happens.

    Reality proves, every moment, that so-called researchers will never be able to understand anything profound about the laws and mechanisms by which existence works… for the simple fact that the understanding of existence is reserved only for the Divinity that created it.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. If seeing were the only way of understanding and interacting with the world than blind people would be deemed psychotic. Seeing is only one of the senses that conveys information to the mind. Instruments that measure things in the world produce information that is understood by the mind even though the instruments are not directly connected to it. What is real is real regardless of the instruments the mind uses to understand it. The mind of a blind man understands the surfaces he walks on because he uses an instrument, his cane, to measure them. A person with sight is not in need of a cane because his eyes are the instrument he uses to understand the surfaces he walks on.

    “. . . If X-rays let chemists peer at the structure of atoms, scanning tunneling microscopes finally revealed the atoms themselves. Rather than bounce light off something, an STM runs a sharp needle over the surface. It’s like chemical braille except the tip never quite touches. As the tip moves along the surface, scientists can reconstruct the atomic landscape, making individual atoms visible at last in the early 1980s. . .”

    https://www.britannica.com/video/187021/discovery-atoms-instruments-scientists-particles

    Like

  8. No matter what area of ​​life we ​​are talking about, people cannot be deceived if they do not want to be deceived. Apart from the obvious medical cases, which are very rare, otherwise all people are intelligent enough to be able to think critically. But that doesn’t stop most people from refusing to think critically, preferring instead to believe unconditionally in scientific or religious hoaxes. Why do people do this? Because this corresponds to their current interests.

    Like

  9. If the desire to not be deceived by others outweighs the desire for truth, then that desire is trauma-based and the result of the excessive desire (gluttony) is self-deception. Same difference, in other words.

    Separation trauma.

    Like

  10. No human can figure out how “energy” is structured in the invisible realm called the submicroscopic realm. We don’t even know what “energy” is. Everything we can understand about the structural relationship between so-called matter and so-called energy is expressed in Hebrews 11:3 “It is by faith we understand that the whole world was made by God’s command so what we see was made by something that cannot be seen”.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Faith and science are mutually exclusive. As are faith and truth. Any true Christian will readily acknowledge this, that faith is, at root, a choice.

      It’s clear now, from this verse and Mike’s ‘like,’ that you and Mike and whoever else here is only interested in using and abusing — weaponizing — the scientific method out of a selfish misunderstanding of what true religious faith really is. George’s Christian faith is true in that it does not require him to relinquish the reason that, in radical honesty, he acknowledges that his religious faith (in and of itself) rightfully and truly lies outside of.

      In “The Normal Christian Life” Watchman Nee wrote, “a man’s only a Christian until you ask him to do something he doesn’t want to do.”

      The animist reading of that verse sees the tacit admission (by the Pharisaic conmen) that ‘god’ cannot be seen. That creation “was made by something that cannot be seen,” ie by the creator about which nothing can be known. Therefore, “It is (only) by faith we understand that the whole world was made by God’s command.”

      Like

  11. Anyone believe in any of these concepts?

    1. Black holes
    2. Dark matter
    3. The expansion of the universe (which is based on the red shift phenomenon).
    4. The space-time continuum
    5. The graviton
    6. The four fundamental forces (and possibly a fifth) in the standard model or the standard model itself
    7. The Big Bang
    8. The unified field theory (unifying gravity with the other forces)

    Just asking.

    Like

      1. I haven’t really accepted any of these as absolute facts. In fact I’m highly critical of most of them. I’m still trying to figure out why there is a limit to the speed of light.

        Like

      2. Reante believes that if something seems reasonable to him, he will accept it without direct evidence. Has he looked into the scientific evidence presented for these theories? Has he looked to see if the evidence adheres to the scientific method? Has he or anyone else ever observed a black hole, dark matter, the expansion of the universe, etc.? These are stories that may seem reasonable, but they are not based on science or direct evidence. They are based in pseudoscience.

        Like

      1. Mike, are you aware of anyone who has looked at the alternative explanations of the mechanisms for bacteriophagic treatments of “bacterial infections” and “targeted viral treatments” of cancer? Would not you agree that if viruses don’t exist and hence do not infect and destroy cells, these two efficacious therapeutic modalities present an interesting enigma?

        Liked by 1 person

      2. I haven’t looked into it much but this seems like another gimmick such as exosome, antibody, and mRNA treatments. They claim that these treatments are beneficial but are they really? Just from a quick search, I found these drawbacks for bacteriophage treatment:

        “This therapy needs more research to find out how well it works. It’s not known if phages may harm people or animals in ways unrelated to direct toxicity.

        Additionally, it’s not known if phage therapy may trigger bacteria to become stronger than the bacteriophage, resulting in phage resistance.

        Cons of phage therapy include the following:

        Phages are currently difficult to prepare for use in people and animals.

        It’s not known what dose or amount of phages should be used.

        It’s not known how long phage therapy may take to work.

        It may be difficult to find the exact phage needed to treat an infection.

        Phages may trigger the immune system to overreact or cause an imbalance.

        Some types of phages don’t work as well as other kinds to treat bacterial infections.

        There may not be enough kinds of phages to treat all bacterial infections.

        Some phages may cause bacteria to become resistant.”

        https://www.healthline.com/health/phage-therapy#disadvantages

        The science does not seem to support the conclusions, which is why bacteriophage treatments are not widely used:

        “Data regarding the use of BPs to treat bacterial disease in humans are few, sometimes conflicting or negative and almost always collected in trials that are not randomized and placebo controlled. Moreover, the preparation of BPs for clinical use is difficult, and not all the problems strictly related with BP biology have been solved.”

        https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2019.00513/full

        In other words, it really doesn’t present an interesting enigma to me as it is just another in a long line of treatments claimed to work that is not backed by science.

        Like

      3. Thank you for your reply! I am afraid it’s a bit hasty and would not do the justice to the issue to rely on a “quick search”, especially considering the weight of the special interests surrounding phage theory. It’s been kept on the fringes of the therapeutic treatments options in the West due to its obvious competition with the antibiotics treatments. It was first innovated in Georgia close to 100 years ago and has been in use ever since. People from all over the world come to be treated for various “chronic infectious” diseases, often, having exhausted all other, more conventional modes of treatment.https://medigroup.ge/en/home-2/
        Insofar as virus treatments of cancers, here are some links of interest: https://www.rigvir.com/products/rigvir.php and https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21645515.2020.1723363https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/10.2217/fon-2022-0440

        Like

      4. You are welcome. 🙂 I never intended my quick search to be a definitive conclusion. It was my initial thoughts. I would need to see actual scientific research demonstrating a beneficial effect using purified/isolated phages, not links to pharmaceutical company sites claiming benefits. Also, the last two links do not work. It is easy to fall into the trap of believing in the claims promoted by these companies, even though there is a lack of reproducible and replicable scientific evidence showing benefit.

        Like

      5. There are number of studies on the use of BF published over the course of the last 100 or so years. It was used in Western Europe before as well.
        The same is true for Rigvir, it’s been used for ~30 years and there are published studies.
        As for the last two links, there is a space missing between the lihks. Unfortunately, I don’t know how to edit existing posts.

        Like

      6. Do you know of any specific studies which adhere to the scientific method with proper controls which provide legitimate proof that these treatments are effective? If you have any, I’d be happy to look at them but I am unfortunately too busy with other research at the moment to try and search for them.

        I want to point out, again, that an accumulation of evidence over decades does not make something true. If that were the case, we wouldn’t be questioning virology. One needs to look at the foundational studies and see if the experimental procedures are legit and whether or not the results were independently reproduced and replicated. These studies need to adhere to the scientific method in order to provide proof of cause and effect. Otherwise, it is the exact same pseudoscience and marketing that we see with numerous other treatment/medications.

        Like

    1. I’m not a Big Scientist, Mike, ye of little faith. But I incorporate science into patterning, which lays beyond science. If I say something is a working truth it is because it stands to reason insofar as I have reasoned with the idea, and that reasoning process is as yours, George – highly critical. The “working” qualifier of working truth allows it to interact with other working and known truths in the patterning system until further notice. This gives patterning flexibility. That’s a good thing. I’m happy to hear your criticisms, George, and respond as I’m able to, like so:

      If there was no limit to the speed of light then volumetric space — and holographic reality by extension — couldn’t exist. If light could be everywhere at once the everywhere would be rendered everywhere and nowhere at once, and as Clarifire concurs, paradoxes don’t exist in unitary reality. There would be no darkness for light to energetically earn one’s way through, right? There would be no fading of light at a distance, as it’s work begins to get out-earned by darkness. Light and dark, these are elemental/primordial consciousnesses animating energy. Conscious energy is the volumetric (holographic) ability to do work and, quantifiably, how much.

      To the thinking Christian

      Like

      1. (hit post button by mistake again)

        Conscious energy is the volumetric (holographic) ability to do work and, quantifiably, how much. Thus the industrial quantum examinations and calculations, thus the million and billion dollar ‘blind man’s canes’ they employ.

        To the thinking Christian, when “God divided the light from the darkness” God limited the light and thus the speed, so that darkness out of which God let there be light would not be undone, which in turn would undo light itself because the universe/creation requires the tension of polarity or it cannot exist.

        God dividing the light from the darkness references ‘the Big Bang’ which is obviously not a new idea as the big bang is just big science looking at the beginning, elemental fundamentals which is something that modern humans have always been able to conceptualize. The big bang is the scientific creation story elementary soup that eventually bore the chemical-based, primordial, biological soup. The Inflationary dynamics held by big science are consistent with the verses in Genesis:. “And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness [was] upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.” In other words, Earth was (eventually) born out of an elementary soup (“waters”). God moving upon the face of the waters is exactly the same as the animist “great spirit/mystery in the sky” with the sky being everything in elementary reality. We have to remember that imperial religions arose because they successfully co-opted pagan protoreligions, and paganism, before that, had successfully conquered and co-opted animist cosmology. They all share the same fractal because the evils of religion lie in their various successes in placing truths in service of themselves (their own cultural hegemony).

        When the first verse says God created heaven and earth, that is not evidence for a flat earth. Heaven and earth in this context — at the very beginning before even light was created — just refers to the universe as nascent, inscrutable dark energy and matter in separation before the conscious explosion of the two in creative symbiosis, in creative tension, in light holography.

        The OT is a highly intelligent document. The Pharisees were brilliant but they were also a bunch of fucking supremacist scumbags who used their brilliance to subjugate everyone they could.

        If there was no limit to the speed of light then time could not exist, right?

        Like

  12. Like religions, sciences are just hoaxes that most people are interested in believing.

    God cannot be found and known by men (so far as it is given to them by God to understand him) using the philosophies of Religions.

    Existence cannot be understood by humans (so far as it is given to them by God to understand it) using so-called scientific methods.

    Like

  13. That’s another excellent comment, Nike, excepting that science is not a hoax in and of itself, though as we well know it can be used as a tool for perpetuating hoaxes on the unawares. Science is a field of limited truths and patternings that can be placed in service of plausibly deniable falsehoods such as germ theory for example.

    Like

  14. Science (one definition):

    the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.

    From the science council:

    Science is the pursuit and application of knowledge and understanding of the natural and social world following a systematic methodology based on evidence.

    Scientific methodology includes the following:

    Objective observation:

    Measurement and data (possibly although not necessarily using mathematics as a tool)

    Evidence

    Experiment and/or observation as benchmarks for testing hypotheses

    Induction: reasoning to establish general rules or conclusions drawn from facts or examples

    Repetition

    Critical analysis

    Verification and testing: critical exposure to scrutiny, peer review and assessment

    Definition of science (Merriam Webster):

    1a: knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method

    b: such knowledge or such a system of knowledge concerned with the physical world and its phenomena : NATURAL SCIENCE

    Definition of scientific method (Merriam Webster):

    principles and procedures for the systematic pursuit of knowledge involving the recognition and formulation of a problem, the collection of data through observation and experiment, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses

    Religion (Merriam-Webster)

    1: a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices

    Science by its definition cannot prove the existence of God. It can only generate a hypothesis that the physical and natural world were caused. Science nevertheless teaches us to look for causes. But it requires knowledge of something to prove its existence.

    Moreover, knowledge is not independent of experience. When science demonstrates that one thing causes another thing then proof is established. When science attempts to demonstrate that something (i.e. an object) is caused but fails to identify the subject of the cause then it is engaged with only a hypothesis of the action and its object as a caused thing,

    At this point science must be abandoned because it cannot fulfill its function. But this is not a fault with science or its method. Science simply cannot obtain the knowledge of the causative agent because it is incapable of having an experience with it. Why is this?

    The physical world being the sum total of all of its components can be known by science because science can have an experience with it. But not with its cause, because science can only be engaged with parts of the whole by studying their interactions. Therefore, science can have no experience with its cause. This is because (according to the hypothesis) the action from the causative agent is complete and cannot be reproduced for measurement or experience.

    At this point science must yield to religion if the hypothesis of causation is to be pursued. This is a logical conclusion because whatever causes something is always greater than the thing caused. This is because the causative agent has power over it.

    So science has run the course as far as it is able to go and must pass the baton to religion in order to account for the first cause. This means that the first cause is also uncaused, which is enough to frighten most scientists to death. The very idea that they are not the single most omnipotent beings in the world is an abomination to them. To admit that their finite minds cannot comprehend the first cause is unthinkable.

    Welcome to the realm of faith. But you’ve been here all along. Why is this? Because man has a spiritual nature. This is so because even if it is consciously rejected it is subconsciously accepted. So science and religion coexist after all, if not in the conscious mind at least in the subconscious.

    Like

    1. George, religion can’t account for the first cause without altering the nature of the first cause because it assigns a valuation (‘God’ or some other idolatrous deification) to the first cause, which without exception results in structural (hierarchical) dogma (idolatrous ‘scripture’). Only animism has honestly accounted for the first cause by adhering to the KISS principle of Reason in its sticking to pure description: Creation’s first cause is the Creator. End of story. Beyond story, Creation itself is the only source of divining the truth. Obviously. Because there is nothing else.

      Faith is a product of the separation trauma of Man’s broken relationship with Creation. Obviously.

      Like

  15. Did “Doctor” Lee respond to the questions put forth by Kaufman? If so anyone got a link? I wanna see him try to wiggle out of his fake arguments 😀

    Liked by 1 person

  16. „I began to sense faintly that secrecy is the keystone of all tyranny. Not force, but secrecy… censorship. When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know, the end result is tyranny and oppression, no matter how holy the motives. Mighty little force is needed to control a man whose mind has been hoodwinked; contrariwise, no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything — you can’t conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him.”
    – Robert A. Heinlein
    —————————————
    1 Thessalonians 5:21 but test them all; hold on to what is good,

    Like

  17. „Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are part of nature and therefore part of the mystery that we are trying to solve.”

    — Max Planck

    Like

  18. „ What we observe is not nature itself but nature exposed to our method of questioning. Our scientific work in physics consists in asking questions about nature in the language that we possess and trying to get an answer from experiment by the means that are at our disposal. Natural science, does not simply describe and explain nature; it is part of the interplay between nature and ourselves. Science no longer is in the position of observer of nature, but rather recognizes itself as part of the interplay between man and nature. The scientific method changes and transforms its object: the procedure can no longer keep its distance from the object.
    The ontology of materialism rested upon the illusion that the kind of existence, the direct “actuality” of the world around us, can be extrapolated into the atomic range. This extrapolation is impossible, however. Is a fundamental error in separating the parts from the whole, the mistake of atomizing what should not be atomized. Unity and complementarity constitute reality. By getting to smaller and smaller units, we do not come to fundamental or indivisible units. But we do come to a point where further division has no meaning. We will have to abandon the philosophy of Democritus and the concept of elementary particles. The reality is in the observations, not the electrons.
    The existing scientific concepts cover always only a very limited part of reality, and the other part that has not yet been understood is infinite. The physicist may be satisfied when he has the mathematical scheme and knows how to use for the interpretation of the experiments. But he has to speak about his results also to non-physicists who will not be satisfied unless some explanation is given in plain language. Even for the physicist the description in plain language will be the criterion of the degree of understanding that has been reached.
    The exact sciences also start from the assumption that in the end it will always be possible to understand nature, even in every new field of experience, but that we may make no a priori assumptions about the meaning of the word understand.”
    ― Werner Heisenberg
    ——————————————-
    „The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you.”
    ― Werner Heisenberg

    Like

  19. „In all my research I have never come across matter. To me the term matter implies a bundle of energy which is given form by an Intelligent Spirit.”

    – Max Planck

    Like

  20. „Experiment is the only means of knowledge at our disposal. Everything else is poetry, imagination.”
    ― Max Planck
    ——————————-
    „If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.”
    — Nikola Tesla
    ——————————-
    „We are mass energy. Everything is energy. EVERYTHING.”
    — Rhonda Byrne
    ——————————-
    Hebrews 11:3
    3 By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God’s command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible.

    Like

  21. ——————————————
    „The wise man should consider that health is the greatest of human blessings. Any man who is intelligent must, on considering that health is of the utmost value to human beings, have the personal understanding necessary to help himself in diseases, and be able to understand and to judge what physicians say and what they administer to his body, being versed in each of these matters to a degree reasonable for a layman.

    Physicians are many in title but very few in reality. We must turn to nature itself, to the observations of the body in health and in disease to learn the truth. Everyone has a doctor in him or her; we just have to help it in its work. The natural healing force within each of us is the greatest force in getting well. Natural forces within us are the true healers of disease.

    If you are not your own doctor, you are a fool.”
    ― Hippocrates
    ——————————————–
    The great advantage of those who lived in the time of Hippocrates is that in their time scientific scams in the field of microscopy and submicroscopy (microbiology, molecular biology, virology, immunology, etc.) had not yet appeared to flood them with billions and billions of lies . Today, people are only concerned with blindly believing the lies of the so-called scientists in the fields of modern medicine and biology, instead of seeking to understand, with their own minds, what is the matter with health, with disease, with harmful factors and methods through which we can help the self-healing processes.

    Like

  22. „La conoscenza avviene per semplificazione Non è un aggiungere, ma un togliere, fino alla perfetta trasparenza.”
    – Donatella Bisutti

    Like

  23. „Knowledge takes place through simplification, not through addition… through dispossession, until perfect transparency.”
    – Donatella Bisutti

    Like

    1. ‘Love’ is the civilized co-optation of Home. Love does not exist as such. Just because Home has been squandered does not mean that ‘Love’ is able to replace it – it is not. ‘Love’ absolutely pales in comparison to being at Home in ALL respects.

      Like

  24. Right. How can energy bodies — holograms — have mass?

    As I’ve said previously, gravity is based on Consciousness (Spirit)(Mystery). (Resting) Mass, by extension — as a derivative of gravity — is also based on Consciousness because mass is the measure of a hologram’s gravity, and it’s specific gravity is the volumetric accounting of the hologram’s gravity that we call density.

    The gravitational pull (resting mass) of a hologram is sourced from the dark matter field that pervades the universe; the field that came before the OT says that ‘god’ let there be light. The more holographic Reality that exists in the universe — the more it grows, and which is dark matter in holographic symbiosis with dark energy — the less dark matter there is. Dark energy’s total, however, is not reduced because it always grows as a function of the universe being in its expansionary phase (the expansionary phase of a torus is my expectation), nevertheless, as always under natural law, the sourcing of dark energy by holographic Lifeforms does of course ‘take’ from dark energy, does reduce dark energy proportionally, because you can’t get something for nothing.

    That light, as a living, conscious, pure light hologram, has no mass (because it has no specific gravity) yet DOES have gravity (otherwise it couldn’t be seen to slightly bend due to the unseen gravity field of dark matter) is EXACTLY how we know both that holographic Reality sources Consciousness from dark matter and that dark matter exists – because we know that something cannot come from nothing, and if (visible) light has Consciousness, which it does by virtue of its symbiotic ‘conscious energy’ holographic existence, then it must also have gravity without mass.

    Of course, light DOES objectively have mass, when the universe is accounted for in totality, including dark matter. It’s just that light has the SAME specific gravity as the dark matter field, which is why we can’t measure its mass because we can’t measure the specific gravity of dark matter, so the specific gravity of light zeroes-out on our instrumentation, resulting in the supposed paradox of the double-slit experiment, which isn’t a paradox at all but just an artifact of flawed, immature experimentation. Industrial physicists can’t see that holographic Reality is sourced from dark matter and dark energy. I only recently saw it myself. So their theory and their math doesn’t know what to do with it. They are fruitlessly trying to figure out with computers how little dark matter ‘weighs’ which is the same thing as trying to reach your destination by endlessly halving the distance. They are doing this because their civilized ontology that is suffused with separation trauma can only see that the gravitational effects on holographic bodies are the only way we can indirectly measure dark matter, when in reality dark matter is Source Gravity. If they knew that dark matter was source gravity and dark energy was source energy and holographic Reality was a symbiosis of the two, they would have a functioning, industrial-culture TOE. But they never will because in the separation trauma of their human supremacism they think they will look stupid in saying that elementary forces of nature such as light have consciousness.

    Like

    1. Gravitational fields bend light. You don’t need dark matter. Massive objects distort gravitational fields and when the light passes through the distorted field it bends.

      Like

      1. And another thing. This probably should have been the first thing I replied to you with: the reason physics justifies dark matter is because the see bends in light that cannot be accounted for by massive bodies. That’s a simple, straightforward reason for them saying dark matter must exist, even though it’s an extremely inconvenient truth for their existing models.

        Like

  25. Yet, George, seeing as how gravity at a distance requires a dark gravitational field of transmission that is not the same thing as the inertial gravitational mass of the massive object, then what can that dark field possibly be other than dark gravitational matter?

    That’s not a rhetorical question. I’d like an answer please.

    You can’t get something for nothing. A massive object in and of itself can’t bend light at a distance. You can’t just reference a “gravitational field” out of convenience and not actually have it mean anything. A massive holographic object can only pull on other holograms because it is pulling through a pre-existing pulling medium (field).

    Like

      1. Used to be a machinist, now an inspector. If the scientists get errors when they do their calculations it may be because their model is inaccurate when it comes to dark matter. They do say that the speed of light has a limit. My question is what is the mechanism that limits the speed of light?

        Like

      2. Yeah clearly they don’t know what to do with dark matter, and I think that’s beautiful and only natural given their culture.

        The ultimate mechanism that limits the speed of light is the finite nature of the universe which can’t harbor infinite dynamics. I’ve already reasoned that space and time couldn’t exist if light was infinite. The consistent mechanics of natural law don’t permit it. Why do you think that there should be some singular mechanism that act specifically on light to limit its speed, if indeed you do?

        Like

  26. It is amazing how easily almost all people take as true the claims of so-called scientists that are never actually proven by direct, uninterpretable, reproducible evidence. This means that this kind of people are either incorrigibly naive, or they want to believe the lies of the so-called scientists because they base their philosophy of life on them.

    I quote:
    “This means that the first cause is also uncaused, which is enough to frighten most scientists to death. The very idea that they are not the single most omnipotent beings in the world is an abomination to them. To admit that their finite minds cannot comprehend the first cause is unthinkable.”

    Liked by 1 person

    1. That’s an immature quote on two fronts. Nobody thinks they’re omnipotent. And omnipotence is not variable.

      It should read “single most potent” and not “single most omnipotent.”

      Like

      1. Most of them are atheists. So they do think they are all powerful because there is nothing greater than them. There is no other person or group of people to compare them to. There is nothing that they cannot achieve as a group given enough time. They are gods in their own minds.

        “The very idea that they are not the single most omnipotent beings in the world is an abomination to them.”

        I ran this through the grammar check at writer.com/grammar-checker/ and it said, “Great work! No grammar errors were found in your text.” Then I tried it at quillbot.com and got no errors.

        Let me look at this a little deeper.

        The very idea (this is a phrase emphasizing there is something to be shocked about and is the primary subject) that (a demonstrative pronoun) they (the secondary subject plural pronoun) are (an equative plural verb preceding the predicate nominative in the secondary subject) not (a particle of negation) the (definite article) single most omnipotent (this is a trigram that functions as an adjective and should be connected with hyphens to read single-most-omnipotent) beings (plural noun) in (preposition) the (definite article) world (noun) is (equative verb conecting the primary subject with its predicate nominative) an (indefinite article) abomination (noun) to (preposition) them (plural pronoun and object of the preposition).

        The meaning of the words in the trigram:

        single (adjective used to mean consisting of a separate-unique whole) most (adjective used to mean in the greatest degree) omnipotent (having unlimited power)

        This is the meaning of the trigram.

        Scientists consist of a separate-unique whole, in the greatest degree, having unlimited power.

        Like

  27. Just want to point out that many times even a layman can understand that much of the “foundations of virology” are invalid.

    Enders won a Nobel Prize after drilling holes into rabbits skulls to “prove that polio is caused by a virus”.

    Perhaps focusing on the glaringly obvious errors of the past would be more likely to open the minds of people / scientists.

    That is really all that has to be done, the truth is on our side.

    Like

  28. Hello again
    Seems like you got a lot of comments on your blog now
    I am wondering: why do some people report getting ill shortly after a family does? Why would two or more people simultaniously get sick?
    And why do you think a lot of people are getting sicker than they’ve ever been before recently?
    Thank you

    Like

    1. Last fall, my wife’s brother and sister came over for a few minutes to see her while they were sick. They were coughing and just miserable-looking. The next day, my wife started feeling bad, and then she went to bed for a couple of days.

      It took about a week for her to get better. I made no effort to avoid her at all during that time. But neither me nor the dogs got ill.

      There must be something they have in common between them in terms of subconscious and/or bioelectrical communication that triggered a detoxification cycle in her. None of them is a picture of health. My wife has various health conditions, but unlike her siblings, she doesn’t drink, smoke, or eat poorly, although this was not always the case with her.

      I’m satisfied that no germs were the cause of her temporary illness.

      Liked by 1 person

    2. I believe it is mostly environmental, however there are many factors (physical, mental, spiritual, etc.) that can cause people to get sick around the same time. There isn’t any one thing. As for why people appear more sick now, we have continued exposure to more and more toxins such as increased air pollution. On top of that, we have a successful fear campaign that has driven people to do things (wear masks, over sanitize, social distance) that affect them both physically and mentally. The treatments, such as the “vaccines,” are also creating more illness. So again, it is many factors, not just one thing that plays into all of this.

      Like

  29. Below… I post briefly about the harmful factors that affect our health and our being’s efforts to heal itself. An accumulation of harmful factors acts negatively on our being, unbalancing and depleting the flows of vital energy that circulate through tissues and organs and modifying or damaging the structure of tissues and organs. These harmful factors are: – negative emotional experiences; – chemical, mineral, biological toxins; – artificial electromagnetism; – excessive effort; – sleep deprivation; – malnutrition; – weather conditions; – iatrogenic; So, in order to be able to rebalance and restore its vital energy flows and to be able to regenerate its tissues and organs, our being is forced to switch to the self-healing state called “disease” by doctors and patients… state of self-healing manifested by unpleasant symptoms through which the body guides our conscious behavior so that we favor the automatic processes of self-healing. All we have to do when we are already in the self-healing state called “disease” is to listen to the guidance of the self-healing symptoms and at most to help the self-healing processes only resort to remedies and procedures natural and harmless therapeutics.

    Like

  30. I would like an article on DIRECT UNINTERPRETABLE and REPEATABLE evidence for the existence of hypothetical atoms. Because if atoms don’t exist… that means molecules don’t exist either. And this means that all the so-called atomistic-molecular sciences are just fairy tales, just like the fairy tale about the emperor’s invisible clothes.

    Like

    1. George recently posted an article of scientists looking at atoms just like a blind man looks at the ground with his cane but you apparently look down on blind men and think they don’t get around good enough.

      Like

  31. Especially in the sub-microscopic realm, using direct, uninterpretable and repeatable methods, so-called scientists can never prove any of the billions of claims they make. All they do is claim that the so-called circumstantial evidence on which they base their assumptions is valid because they have scientific authority, scientific consensus, and reference laboratories on their side. More specifically, so-called scientists claim that they are right in everything they say, because they are the only people capable of understanding existence.

    Like

    1. You would benefit greatly from outgrowing your negative emotional reactionaryism so that you can look clearly (intelligently) upon reality rather than let your emotions fog your seeing ability. As you’ve said yourself, negative emotions cause disease. That goes for diseases of both mind and body. Diseased thinking is a real thing. It’s all around us all the time. It’s the elephant in the intellectual room.

      Giving your negative emotions over to Reason is the answer. In Reason we cannot be mentally abused by the dominant culture, which leaves us free to see clearly.

      Like

  32. Matthew 12:30 „Whoever is not with me is against me… ” said the Christ of the World.
    ———————————–
    The real disease of many people is of the soul… and it is exactly the same as that of Satan and the demons.
    ———————————-
    2 Corinthians 11:14 And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light. 15 It is not surprising, then, if his servants also masquerade as servants of righteousness. Their end will be what their actions deserve.

    Like

    1. Retreating into your religion and stupidly weaponizing your crutch of a religion against others (me) is exactly the infantilized response they want you to make when you’re feeling cornered.

      A real man needs to learn how to stand on his own two feet.

      Healing is what you need. Go find you a piece of land to come alongside and it’ll lead you beyond the prison of your mind. It’ll lead you home, without fail.

      ‘Jesus’ is a very well built fake home, built by Pharisees in order to put ultimate mindfuck over on gentiles, in order to subjugate them, and your behavior is direct evidence of that.

      Like

  33. Read Hans Christian Andersen’s fairy tale about the emperor’s new (invisible) clothes. It is the story of our World where many satanized crooks, appointed to leadership positions by the repressive system, pretend to be religious leaders, politicians, scientists, etc. and in which great masses of credulous people, who are lazy, arrogant, fearful, and frivolous, give full credence to them, although they know nothing of religion, politics, or science, but are only ignorant fools because they never ask questions about anything .

    Like

  34. It is not the lack of correct information that makes us stupid fools who blindly believe all the lies and scams of the so-called experts and specialists of the System… because we can gradually come into possession of the correct information if we make a habit of thinking critical, to question everything and become keen observers of reality.

    What makes us stupid naive people who blindly believe all the lies and scams of the so-called experts and specialists of the System… is the comfortable, frivolous and fearful attitude of the soul, because of which we refuse to think critically, we refuse to put everything on doubt and refuse to become keen observers of reality.

    1 Thessalonians 5:21
    but search all things, and keep what is good!

    Like

    1. Thanks Nike.
      Your comments are spot on.
      We do have a huge problem . Partly through laziness or conditioning through mass schooling , people have outsourced basic thinking and logic .

      Science has created the mess and will need to get humans out of this mess .
      But people have to start thinking differently. But modern humanity has lost touch with reality and spirituality and needs to get out of the indoctrination that science or religion is the answer to its perceived problems.

      —-
      Where humanity , some take aways from this video

      STEFAN LANKA – ILSEDORA LAKER: BIOLOGY AFTER HAMER PT. 1
      https://www.bitchute.com/video/r2ugAzuJhBfM/

      This is what the atom theory does not allow us to imagine .
      We have a sudden split in our imagination that we cannot think that the principle in the big is the principle of the smallest. We have a mental break that is a severe slash-back for our civilisation causing wars , believing in the bad , having problems seeing god/ field . If we have no feeling that matter which we touch , which we feel when we swim, when we breathe. This is what the Indians call prana , Chinese call chi .
      This is what the nerve cells are transporting, this quick energy we consist out off. This is the reason we see the Hamerische circles in the brain with the trauma acting up upon us in a split second , on the psyche , brain organ level , it must go through this primordial substance.
      In the atom theory you cannot see it, it is a blocking, it is a mental castration of human kind. The principle as in the big , so in the small is not possible in the atom theory.

      We cannot feel as one if we feel we live in a vacuum. We do not start where it seems because we have to breath this energy input/ output every second and we are eventually going to die , it means we are part of everything . And it will not even start with the sun , we are connected with this substances, Aristotle called it ether ,where everything , every form of energy and every form of radiation is originating from. It transports information.
      We have the building substance of life, the energy substance and the information substance of life all in one.
      Ether/ elementary substance – all elements are going out of it and going back into it , it is fatty acid soluble substance has a density of 1.4 kg/ L .
      ( PI water – https://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/pi-water-understanding-water-recognising-life.pdf)

      A better view on life.
      -Life is always going to be a secret. if you stay decent and ask the right questions you are going to get answers.
      -Always keep in mind – a principle taught in Chinese medicine and philosophy that our models and explanation of today could be invalid tomorrow.
      Always when dr Lanka is asked a question, the best answer is going to come, can give the view at the moment and what disagrees with.

      We will be living in another society and getting back to the roots , to be confident in creation , that everything makes sense, it is connected .
      We will see different diseases in the future because we will be not afraid as a culture, as a human being.

      Covid -19 , the kind of fear, especially the way children and elderly are experiencing will produce a lot of symptoms which we have not been seen before . And is forcing us to adapt. This adaptation process will present as new diseases.
      It depends also how we , as a culture , are perceiving this, are perceiving life.
      With the new understandings they have seen chronic illnesses that can dissolve in one session, one cannot explain it.
      Where the primordial substance is concerned , it helps explained the immediacy , of how conflicts dissolve make a physical change immediately .

      And we are one.
      If we are inside the cellular theory that every defect is going out, is origination from one cell going into another you cannot even accept healing phases, you cannot see it. You canot see that you are a field .
      Every part of the body has its own function and its own awareness of its function.
      -We are a materialisation of a consciousness. This gives you back the respect and the faith in life and meaning in life that you are part of a big thing which has a meaning.
      -If live in a materialistic thinking, Friedrich Nietzsche showed what it meant to him if try to imagine that life is completely meaningless amd just an aggregation of matter that came together by accident that is going to decay , nothing stays and in the end everything is meaningless . You can see the madness outside, this is the result if such a perception of life and the greediness.
      If you think that everything has no meaning, that nothing stays, all the information , what you perceive , what you did , what you had , has no meaning then you act accordingly, you act with greed, etc.
      It is that chaos if you act according to that philosophy.

      Like

  35. For anyone theologically minded, which of these popular doctrines are true and which are false?

    1. The Trinity.

    2. The immortality of the soul (that the soul cannot die).

    3. Original sin (and death as a consequence)

    4. That some souls are tormented in a fiery hell after death.

    5. Foreordination or the (foreknowledge of God).

    6. The free will of man.

    7. Unforgivable sin

    8. The ransom sacrifice of Christ.

    9. The existence of the devil or Satan

    Just asking.

    Like

Leave a Reply to Mike Stone Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: