Gaining Perspective with Jesse Zurawell

Thanks, Mike,
A key point: air pollution does make us ill. Known since the 1950s and 1960s, “yellow smog” in New York City which could be touched. In fact, The famous 1948 Donora smog outbreak killed 20 people and caused respiratory problems for 6,000 of the 14,000 people living in Donora, Pennsylvania, a mill town outside Pittsburgh. In Pittsburgh itself, the air was yellow on the day i passed through the city in August ’71. And there were known incidents in Britain even before then.

The Bill Gates front group GAVI is pushing anti-bacterial jabs for the people of Chad, as if their problems result from bacteria (or viruses) rather than air pollution. Pathogens are routinely blamed for diseases resulting from air pollution and toxic chemicals. The fires in Canada have led to a deteriorated air quality in both the New York area where Zurawell lives as well as Iowa, where Stone lives. The three areas worst hit by “COVID,” Wuhan in China, Italy’s Lombardy region, and New York City, all have real bad air, which is being characterized as “an exacerbating factor for catching “COVID”” rather than tagged as a primary, probably THE primary cause of the massive outbreaks of respiratory illnesses in those places. “Covid,” other viruses and bacteria are tagged rather than the air quality. Increasing wildfires are being characterized now as “the new normal,” just like with “the virus,” and in fact measures such as wearing masks are also being recommended.

So far, i pretty strongly agreed with the discussion. Things changed after the break, as both started pushing the idea that the wildfires becoming worse and more frequent is the result of weather engineering which is creating droughts. I would like to put forth the following perspective in a friendly manner, and hope to see it being responded to.

First of all, just because the-powers-that-shouldn’t-be lie about virology and contagion theory does not mean that they lie about everything. Virology is a pseudo science, a little more than 100 years old, and has never featured repeatable, falsifiable experiments which involve independent variables. This is NOT the case with climate science, which is based upon the sciences of thermodynamics/heat transfer, fluid mechanics and gas dynamics, all of which are hundreds of years old, and do feature repeatable, falsifiable experiments which involve independent variables. Climate science is NOT just computer models, it was practiced well before there were any computers around at all. I studied all these sciences, had to for my engineering degree.

What is being characterized as human-driven global climate chaos is not “natural climate change,” as Zurawell and Stone stated, it is happening at rates which are many, many times faster than anything on record going back millions of years, and that’s the key factor, the rate. Also, the global weather/climate system (“weather” is short term, “climate” is long term) is not a machine. Both participants seemed to suggest as if one could create weather with predictable outcomes by spraying the atmosphere with the “chemtrails,” as if creating artificial clouds over one area could lead to a predictable warming effect upon it. The global weather/climate system is a process which involves thousands of variables, many of which are unknown, many others not accurately measurable, and the ways in which they interact are not all known or even understood, e.g. the way the atmosphere and the oceans interact. They both involve all the billions and billions of living organisms living in them.

They asserted that since cloud seeding can produce enhanced amounts of rain, it can also create droughts, as if this is a simple mechanical process with a forward/reverse lever. in fact, creating rain cannot be done out of thin air. Required amounts of moisture need to be present, as well as appropriate local atmospheric dynamics. The process which causes droughts however is NOT local, it is part of global weather patterns, particularly as to where high pressure cells set up. Do you have any idea how much energy it takes to create a high pressure cell, or to affect the global jet streams to act in particular ways so as to do so?

There is no such thing as local weather, only local manifestations of global patterns. With a system which is so little understood, let alone perfectly measurable, can either participant explain how one can create PREDICTABLE outcomes, which is what “engineering” is about?

A closing note. This does not remotely mean that what the-powers-that-shouldn’t-be wish to do about the growing global climate chaos is in any way good. Spraying the atmosphere with chemicals cannot possibly lead to specific outcomes unless a uniform “shield” is created over the entire atmosphere. Otherwise, what would result is just enhanced chaos. And there is no way to create such “shield” which would remain stable in an inherently unstable atmosphere. Any notions that doing do could accomplish something re climate chaos is wooly-brained at best, a result of misunderstanding the global weather/climate system as a machine. At worst, it is downright deception. I believe it’s the latter, with the real aim being the mass poisoning of the world’s population, rendering it addled and dependent upon Big Pharma products, as well as rendering the planet’s water and land toxic, making it impossible to survive outside the control nexus matrix, which we are being herded into.

I have a few questions about radiation contaminated forests and forest fires.

How much radiation have forests in Canada absorbed from Fukushima fallout? How long does radiation last in trees when they absorb it? How much is released in forest fires?

Is this a legitimate concern? I’ve read a few articles but haven’t come to any conclusion yet.

Beyond the Helix: DNA’s Complex Folding Unveils New Functions

(New “tests” to find “virus infection” might be on the way.)

“Last year, Dr. Jaffrey and colleagues reported discovering one such molecule: a single-stranded DNA that folds in a way that allows it to mimic the activity of GFP. The DNA molecule, which Dr. Jaffrey dubbed “lettuce” for the color of its fluorescent emissions, works by binding to another small organic molecule, a potentially fluorescent “fluorophore” similar to the one at the heart of GFP, and squeezing it in a way that activates its ability to fluoresce. The researchers demonstrated the lettuce-fluorophore combination as a fluorescent tag for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2, the cause of COVID-19.”

https://scitechdaily.com/beyond-the-helix-dnas-complex-folding-unveils-new-functions/?expand_article=1

Most people today do not think. They think they think, but they don’t. They defer thinking to the experts acknowledged by officialdom. Those unacknowledged by officialdom are simply quacks. It’s getting even worse now with the advent of AI programs. Here is an example of what truth tellers are up against.

Who claims viruses are not real?

“There is no reputable scientific or medical authority that claims viruses are not real. The existence of viruses has been extensively researched, documented, and confirmed by countless scientific studies and observations. Viruses are a well-established part of the field of virology, and their role in causing various diseases is well understood.

However, it’s worth noting that there are some fringe groups or individuals who may deny the existence of viruses or propagate misinformation about them. Such views are not supported by scientific evidence and are considered pseudoscientific or conspiracy theories. It’s always important to rely on credible sources, such as reputable scientific organizations and healthcare institutions, for accurate information about viruses and other scientific matters.”

This message has been generated by Nova – download it for free:

https://novaappai.page.link/MnD5GtUVmQ35D97L8

The latest vaccine related news.
Lancet Study on Covid Vaccine Autopsies Finds 74% Were Caused by Vaccine – Study is Removed Within 24 Hours
https://dailysceptic.org/2023/07/06/lancet-study-on-covid-vaccine-autopsies-finds-74-were-caused-by-vaccine-journal-removes-study-within-24-hours/
(CDC) Seizures reported in some children after mRNA Covid vaccination
https://sharylattkisson.com/2023/07/cdc-seizures-reported-in-some-children-after-mrna-covid-vaccination/
WHO & Gates Inc announce plans to flood Africa with ultra dangerous malaria “vaccines”
https://www.dossier.today/p/who-and-gates-inc-announce-plans
First-ever malaria vaccine set for roll-out in Africa – WHO
https://www.rt.com/africa/579296-africa-receives-first-ever-malaria-vaccine/

How one of nature’s most fundamental molecules forms

(How looking at a dead, frozen, and to some extent dehydrated, mass of what was once alive, in a different chemical state, and functioning in some unknown capacity tells you exactly what was happening before that dead mass of energy was transformed by cryo-EM.).

“Life runs on ribosomes. Every cell on Earth needs ribosomes to translate genetic information into all the proteins needed for the organism to function—and to in turn make more ribosomes. But scientists still lack a clear understanding of how these essential nanomachines are assembled. . .

. . .”We now have a pretty good idea of how the large ribosomal subunit is assembled in humans,” says Rockefeller’s Sebastian Klinge. “We still have quite a few gaps in our understanding, but we certainly now have a much better idea than we had before.” . . .

. . .Vanden Broeck and Klinge combined new techniques involving a mashup of genome editing and biochemistry, to capture high-resolution cryo-EM structures of 24 human large ribosomal subunit assembly intermediates as they were maturing. . .”

https://phys.org/news/2023-07-nature-fundamental-molecules.html

Ribosomes are artifacts that arise from both cryo-EM and EM. They have this idea that ribosomes are composed of “two subunits: a small subunit, known as 40S, which is responsible for decoding messenger RNA, and a large subunit (60S), which attaches protein pieces together.” They also claim ribosomes played a role in cellular evolution.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6337102/

There is a discussion about the subunits at

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ribosome

But, again, what they are looking at is dead matter altered by a process that causes a transformation from a previously unknown biochemical state of energy in a living entity. They do not produce video of anything moving. All they have is an image devoid of any action. There is nothing in motion. Nothing is happening. They imagine that the things they see in their images function in some mechanical-like process.

They claim the ribosome “reads” the messenger RNA (mRNA) sequence and “translates” that genetic “code” into a specified string of amino acids, which “grow” into long chains that “fold” to “form” proteins.
They claim they know what a ribosome does, but not how it does it. Words like “reads”, “translates”, using “code” to “grow,” “form”, and “fold” don’t explain anything scientific about how biochemical processes function. Their process does not produce any demonstration of what they claim ribosomes do.

Consider what they say about water.

“Up to 60% of the human adult body is water. According to Mitchell and others (1945), the brain and heart are composed of 73% water, and the lungs are about 83% water. The skin contains 64% water, muscles and kidneys are 79%, and even the bones are watery: 31%.”

https://www.usgs.gov/special-topics/water-science-school/science/water-you-water-and-human-body#overview

They admit that the body is mostly water, but in the same breath they claim that structured water is considered to be a pseudoscience. Instead they maintain there are various kinds of chemical structures that function like micromachines within cells. They point to the artifacts generated by the various forms of electron microscopy to support their conclusions. They even create complex algorithms that run on computer software to align data taken from analysis of their artifacts to conform to their mechanical models.

Whenever a scientist ventures too far from the orthodox model of the cell he is labeled a heretic. Stephen Lanka is a recent example of one such individual. Others, like Harold Hillman and Gilbert Ling, had their lab funding cut off when they furnished proof that the orthodox model of the cell was a fraud.

Just as they rewrite the past to control the future, and control the people by controlling their environment, which they call climate change management, they control the macro world through control of the micro world.

The virus model is dependent upon the cell model. The specific antibody model is dependent upon the cell model with its so-called “receptors” and “ribosomes”. The concept of vaccination to provide protection is the external aspect of the scam that is dependent upon the orthodox model of the cell – no receptors means no virus binding to the cell, no ribosomes means no virus replication, and no specific antibodies means no virus immunity from injections.

The scam is comprised of these integrated parts – the virus theory, the cell theory, and the immune system theory. It’s a three-legged stool that fails if any one leg is removed, which is why they guard every leg from any adventurous wood cutter.

Since they’ve been able to control the medical educational system, the media, and the medical boards that license doctors, they have circled the wagons to protect the scam so that few individuals see any reason to attack their position from without. Those on the outside actually think they are the ones that are protected. So they bear some degree of responsibility for their actions because they trust human authority and fear the consequences of not doing so.