Using logic and evidence to hold germ theory and virology accountable.

A few years ago, a loved one of mine was tragically misdiagnosed and mistreated by the medical system. They were subjected to toxic drugs and invasive procedures that only worsened their suffering and ultimately cost them their life.

In searching for ways to truly help them, I uncovered uncomfortable truths about germ “theory” and the foundations of modern “health” care. I discovered the battle between Antoine Béchamp and Louis Pasteur, the latter widely credited despite accusations of plagiarism. I studied the contrasts between germ “theory” and terrain theory, learned of the Rockefellers’ role in shaping medical institutions, and immersed myself in the work of David Crowe, Stefan Lanka, Roberto Giraldo, The Perth Group, Liam Scheff, Celia Farber, and others.

By 2020, it became clear I could no longer remain silent. The world was swept into a so-called “pandemic,” driven by flawed tests, rampant fear, and deliberate propaganda. People acted on pharmaceutical narratives, unaware that there exists a more logical, evidence-based perspective—one rooted in knowledge, not fear.

I began sharing what I found on Facebook, but censorship quickly made that nearly impossible. This blog is my response. Here I will expose the fallacies of virology, the absence of valid proof for “viruses” and “antibodies,” the trickery of genomics, and the risks of vaccines and medical interventions—while also highlighting natural approaches to health.

I am not a doctor or virologist. My background is in Health and Exercise Science; I’ve worked as a personal trainer, nutritionist, and now wellness coach. What I share comes from years of independent research and direct engagement with original studies. As Kary Mullis—Nobel Prize winner and inventor of the PCR test—reminded us, the truth does not require specialized credentials, only logic and evidence:

"I think it’s simple logic. It doesn’t require that anyone have any specialized knowledge of the field. The fact is that if there were evidence that HIV causes AIDS-if anyone who was in fact a specialist in that area could write a review of the literature, in which a number of scientific studies were cited that either singly or as a group could support the hypothesis that HIV is the probable cause of AIDS-somebody would have written it. There’s no paper, nor is there a review mentioning a number of papers that all taken together would support that statement.” – Kary Mullis

My hope is that the insights I’ve gathered will serve you in your own journey—toward clarity, health, and freedom from fear. After all, fear is the only real “virus,” and truth is the cure.