The No “Virus” Challenge

So-called electron microscopy is a scam that must be completely and permanently removed from so-called molecular biology. Also, the so-called biochemical characterization of hypothetical proteins and nucleotides is a pseudo-scientific farce, completely devoid of any real value.

I am not a scientist. But I have studied the history of science. As far as I am aware the concept of asymptomatic carrier and transmission is completely new since covid. I cannot help but feel that the idea that I am being forced to take synthetic toxins while being perfectly healthy is the elephant in the room which the majority of paid medics are conveniently ignoring.

Isolation should be done only in ways that do not affect the particles and visualization should be done only in 3D and only through optical microscopy methods that are not harmful. What cannot be highlighted by optical means cannot be characterized. The so-called indirect methods used by so-called molecular biologists are pure scams as long as they only make assumptions that are impossible to prove to be true.

Surprised to see Lank’s name isn’t on there, anything gone on here ?

Lanka not taking part in this challenge ?

I don’t really know all the details of electron microscopy, but I agree with Nike, the scientists should make sure that the tools that are using are giving them authentic answers.
I look forward to see what the challege yeilds. It is a great idea.

I read a good article going back to the roots of “virology” and how there was absolutely no scientific method behind it’s creation. Doctors working for Rockefeller just determined out of thin air that viruses had been seen and they were the problem for causing afflictions like polio. The AMA determined what doctors could believe and practice and all others who did not agree were left out of the good-old-boys club or excoriated out of existence.

The modern stone age medical system is never going back on this because they have been in the driver’s seat for over 100 years. Their corruption is etched in granite and its deep roots run all the way to China. They now have billions of potential patients hoodwinked into believing that some nasty death causing virus is floating around just waiting to grab hold of them. Good luck to Mr. Cowan, but he isn’t going to get any takers from the medical establishment…they are mostly cowards and making to much money to ever give up this charade.

That’s so awesome that you get to be involved in this historic challenge!  Yay!  I am excited about this.  Glad he got the funding, too.  You are a great leader in this movement, which basically requires a very high standard of clear thinking and ethics and hard work, which you are very gifted with.  😊😁😎🥰

Now waiting for the other shoe to drop.

Step Two is problematic for anybody who cares about honesty.

Saying that the corona genome should not be found in subclinical samples is an incorrect, unscientific view of diagnostics; even according to Terrain Theory, presence of toxins do not always cause diagnosable disease. For a Terrain theorist to wield a double-standard against a germ theorist is hypocritical.

Saying that genetic sequencings of the corona genomes from the samples should all be identical is also unscientific/unreasonable in the corona context because of the ‘mutations.’ There could be more than one ‘strain’ present.

Lastly, any of the signatories — Mike is one to be sure — who do not believe in genomics is being dishonest, opportunistic, and is exhibiting poor character by signing-on to this document, because ‘the challenge ‘ explicitly legitimizes genomics.

An honest person can’t have their cake and eat it too.

I suggest this challenge must be directly submitted to all virology and microbiology journals. As well, it should be directly sent to a wide range of virologists and microbiologists. A list should be published of all those who received this challenge along with their response to this challenge. I would call this the “Shame List” because we should expect, few, if any, will take up the challenge.

Mike, PLEASE target Dan Wilson PhD (Debunk the Funk on Twitter)

Molecular biologist = expert specialized in “the emperor’s invisible clothes”.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out. But since virology is more like a religion I can only offer the following analogy.

Seventh Day Adventists (a fringe Christian religion) believe that death is an unconscious sleep or soul death. Catholics (the largest Christian religion) believe in the immortality of the soul or that the soul never dies. Yet they both claim that the Bible supports their view and does not contradict itself. It has been this way for a long time. What would happened if the leaders of the Seventh-Day Adventists proposed a debate with the leaders of the Catholic religion to resolve this issue? Would the Catholic leaders debate them or ignore them? I think the answer to that is obvious.

Scientist have created this Frankenstein science so they will need to undo it before it devours its own children as Erwin Chargaff predicted.
“ The Torch of Erwin Chargaff and the Fire of Heraklitus Devour Their Children”

—-

In silico ( computer generated ) virus that does not exist in reality.
Dr Kevin Corbett
2 min.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/fZt4dYIGXkLL/

————
Video description

In Silico” Science = “science” modelled in a computer (but not seen in reality = Scientism
The old virology, until 1952, considered a virus to be a toxic protein with the capability of self-replication, so the proteins themselves were considered to be the “genetic material”.
In 1952 there were some experiments which showed a protein can only be replicated when there is a nucleic acid as a catalysator.
From this experiment onwards, Virologists believed the nucleic acid was the genetic material.
Science relies on the Watch Maker Analogy Scientists, whether they realise it or not, rely on the idea that there is a Map of Life.
The Watchmaker analogy is a teleological argument. In simple terms, it states that because there is a design, there must be a designer.
Genetics Geneticists, who intrinsically rely on watchmaker analogy, when they could NOT sequence the whole strand, invented one!
Craig Venter is known for leading the first draft sequence of the human genome and assembled the first team to transfect a cell with a synthetic chromosome.
Shotgun Cloning – if we can not sequence entire strand, lets cut it into very short pieces of nucleic acid, dump it in a model and let that assemble it for him. MAGIC! Is COVID-19 A Construct?
A Complete Mental Construct! And its easy to see!
2 min.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/fZt4dYIGXkLL/

——
A relevant takeaway, rough translation and link
Summer interview with Dr Lanka German -https://www.bitchute.com/video/494eQLlXcxHC/

Disproven genetics ( known since 2000 when they came up with epigenetic to keep the theory going and 2008 even published an article in main stream media .
Genome in dissolution.

https://telegra.ph/Genetics-Genome-in-Dissolution-11-01

Each time they read it is something different as every nucleus has a different nucleic acid.

Craig Venter, builds a private company , gets billions of taxpayers money.
Says listen, we blast the chromosomes as cannot read the large parts, blast them into mini parts that we can read. Called shot gun cloning and sequencing.
They read the small parts , they say we multiply so much so and if take the average that is reality.

An example.
They multiply with PCR a large and diverse amount . They use a very dirty PCR in a test tube which introduces a lot of errors which get magnified at every stage.
There is such a high sequences variability and error using todays computer capacity that it is impossible to calculate it with computers in 10 years time.
They choose and organise fragments into a thought model , pure mathematics .

Shotgun sequencing -( See also -disadvantages ; presented as reality. Unbelievable , they are given billions and get away with selling a method of cheating as ‘science’ )

https://www.yourgenome.org/facts/what-is-shotgun-sequencing/

“The sequenced fragments are then assembled together by computer programs that find where fragments overlap.”
You can imagine shotgun sequencing as being a bit like shredding multiple copies
of a book (which in this case is a genome), mixing up all the fragments and then
reassembling the original text (genome) by finding fragments with text that overlap
and piecing the book back together again”

Dr Lanka did the control experiments with measles in the measles process.

Dr Lanka ‘s team recent control experiments.
They use normal human tissues and with 14 cycles they can get Sars Cov -2, Ebola, HIV.
They have proven, what the Americans say : ‘ You get what you pay for’.

The bioinformaticians/ virologists do 2 dirty PCRs to try to calculate something and they use over 30 cycles which ,biochemically is perverse, antiscientific.
And what they describe in their data is that they found nothing .

So they do a dirty PCR and cannot get the virus .They do a second dirty PCR.
That would mean , in practice, one would need to take 2 PCRs on a person to claim there is a virus.
But in the lab they do 2 PCR combination , one after the other .
That means that they have contradicted themselves . They describe in details that they have nothing after the first PCR.

The virus was calculated in Shanghai and not in Wuhan.
The first one that comes up with the genome is the master. The rest just repeat the steps as told.
Professor Chang is world master of the genome.

We can prove they have cheated.
From their data , they say they took 56, 000 million fragments out of 6 trillion
molecules with which they worked. Out of those 56,000 million, half were blanked out. He told them we want the blanked out data and heard nothing .
With the 26,000 million that were not blanked out Lanka’s team could not reproduce one single step described in the Chinese paper.

The Chinese claimed the sequences are not human as could not find them in the human data base.
Thankfully , he knows a mathematician who does not want to be named and worked out that they are human sequences.
Out of the not blanked sequences he figured out how the Chinese manipulated the data to hide that it was of human origin.

Why did they blanked some out? So people cannot figure out they are human sequences. There is no calculation capacity to work out which sequence the PCR produces, the calculations stop at around 20 cycles..
The Chinese do 35-40 cycles. They produce a multitude of molecules that cannot even be calculated and choose those they need that fit into their model .

As a method it is cheating.

It is fraud.

Hey Mike, not sure if any in the group has contact with Poornima Wagh, She has 2 PhDs in Virology and Immunology 20 year career as a Lab researcher and scientist, destroys the Covid scam. She and 6 other labs proved covid is a scam. Maybe she can get some labs on board?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/btuJXs0glmla

Recently on telegram.

USA (Department of Biological Sciences) – Does SARS-CoV-2 exist or has it never been detected⁉️

In a detailed peer-reviewed meta-analysis on the current state of knowledge of SARS-CoV-2, lead author Yasin Ali Muhammad of the Department of Biological Sciences, explores the question of whether SARS-CoV-2 exists at all.

This study trumps big names in the field of virology, both on the virus-believing side and the now many well-known critics such as Dr. Stefan Lanka, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, and Dr. Tom Cowan, etc.

Three theories are analysed 🔬

1️⃣ SARS-CoV-2 of natural origin?

2️⃣ SARS-CoV-2 an origin from the laboratory?

3️⃣ SARS-CoV-2 does not exist and has never been detected.

Conclusion of the study❗️

There is insufficient evidence either for the claim of a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2, or for its emergence in a laboratory, even after 2 years. The strongest evidence is on the side of those who pointed out that there is no SARS-CoV-2!

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
deepL translate:

https://t.me/Corona_Fakten/1039

————-

Abstract

Background
At the time of this writing, SARS-CoV-2 has reportedly claimed the lives of millions of people worldwide. However, there is still disagreement concerning the origin of SARS-CoV-2, its true nature, and the extent of its pathogenicity. Thus, the purpose of this manuscript is to highlight and critically analyze these differences so that research efforts can be geared toward addressing these concerns.

Main Body
For this purpose, the author studied the perspectives of both conventional and non-conventional scientists, physicians, and researchers in an attempt to understand the points of contention and the reasons for the vast gulf in perspective.

Conclusion
After reviewing the varying but divergent perspective pertaining to the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and the premises used to justify them, it has become clear that if the scientific community is to put a halt to the spread of misinformation pertaining to the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, the predominant scientific community (particularly the microbiologist/immunologist) must carry out the requisite scientific procedures and encourage governmental/academic transparency.

https://bnrc.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42269-022-00712-4

I completely agree, that there is no proof for the virology theory – still I wonder, what makes people sick. Just got the “flu” from my daughter – there must be something infectious…

Post on Corona_ Fakten
——-

The “No Virus” Challenge – 5 virology laboratories worldwide are taking part in this experiment, and none knows the identity of the other participating laboratories❗️

➖ EXPLANATION OF THE VIRUS DEBATE➖

After we published the control experiments of Dr. Stefan Lanka, which unfortunately did not arouse any interest among the Corona critics in the DACH region, but rather suppressed its serious explosive power, our colleagues from many countries started a very extensive control experiment.

This action was signed by renowned scientists 🧑🔬👩🔬✍️

Thomas Cowan, MD Mark Bailey, MD Samantha Bailey, MD ,Jitendra Banjara, MSc Kelly Brogan, MD Kevin Corbett, PhD Mufassil Dingankar, BHMS Michael Donio, MS Jordan Grant, MD Andrew Kaufman, MD Valentina Kiseleva, MD Christine Massey, MSc
Paul McSheehy, PhD Prof. Timothy Noakes, MD Sachin Pethkar, BAMS Saeed Qureshi, PhD Stefano Scoglio, PhD Mike Stone, BEXSc, Amandha Vollmer, NDoc,

and also Michael Yeadon, PhD

We are grateful🙏🏻 that all these colleagues have studied, reviewed and understood our many years of preliminary work, and with this action, once again and fully refute the virus existence claim.

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖

deepL translate

https://t.me/Corona_Fakten/1040

I’ll bet you didn’t know . . .
“Viruses frequently spread among cells or hosts in groups, with multiple viral genomes inside the same infectious unit. These collective infectious units can consist of multiple viral genomes inside the same virion, or multiple virions inside a larger structure such as a vesicle. Collective infectious units deliver multiple viral genomes to the same cell simultaneously, which can have important implications for viral pathogenesis, antiviral resistance, and social evolution.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6470120/#:~:text=Viruses%20frequently%20spread%20among%20cells,structure%20such%20as%20a%20vesicle.
They’ve even thrown in a few equations to convince you of the truthfulness of their claim. Only one minor problem – no single virion has ever been defined. In order to define a virion as an infectious agent the first step would be to put it in isolation. The CDC knows what it means to put something in isolation because they recommend it for people who test positive for Covid.
“People who are confirmed to have COVID-19 or are showing symptoms of COVID-19 need to isolate regardless of their vaccination status.”
They recommend that you are by yourself, which is defined as being away from others.
“Isolation is used to separate people with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 from those without COVID-19. People who are in isolation should stay home until it’s safe for them to be around others.”
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/quarantine-isolation.html#:~:text=People%20who%20are%20confirmed%20to,or%20not%20they%20have%20symptoms.
So there you have it. They know what isolation means. But they have a short memory when it comes to a virus because they change the meaning of the word isolate when they claim to isolate viruses because they don’t ever produce a single virion or even a group of virions.
Nevertheless, get ready for this!
“Scientists isolate, hold, photograph individual Rubidium 85 atom
(PhysOrg.com) — In a major physics breakthrough, University of Otago scientists have developed a technique to consistently isolate and capture a fast-moving neutral atom – and have also seen and photographed this atom for the first time.
The entrapment of the Rubidium 85 atom is the result of a three-year research project funded by the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology, and has already prompted world-wide interest in the new science which will flow from the breakthrough.
A team of four researchers from Otago’s Physics Department, led by Dr Mikkel F. Andersen, used laser cooling technology to dramatically slow a group of rubidium 85 atoms. A laser-beam, or “optical tweezers”, was then deployed to isolate and hold one atom – at which point it could be photographed through a microscope.”
https://phys.org/news/2010-10-scientists-isolate-individual-rubidium-atom.html
Did you catch that? “. . . to isolate and hold one single atom . . .”
Now a single atom is much much smaller than a virion. So where are the headlines that say virologists isolate and hold one virion? Why is it that when virologists use the word isolate it has a totally different meaning from when scientists use the word? Shouldn’t the virologists be correcting the scientists and telling them that what they did was not isolation?
How about that word “entrapment,” what does that mean? Here’s one definition:
“the state of being caught in or as in a trap.”
Let’s consider an example of the use of the word entrap. Suppose you find these little brown pellets in the corner of your bedroom on the floor. Now after you’ve seen these little pellets you suspect that there is a mouse in your house. Next you want to prove if your theory is correct so you go out and buy a mousetrap. You know the rest of the story.
Now when virologists see a diseased condition in human cells they theorize that there is a virus in the body. But they don’t go out and buy a virion trap to entrap a viral particle. If they did that it would prove the virus caused the disease in the same way the mousetrap proved the mouse left the pellets in the corner of your bedroom. Therefore entrapment proves isolation.
So the logical question is, when have virologists ever entrapped a virus? And the answer is, never. They are all liars.

Obviously something like a virus exists or else the mRNA shots would not be able to do the damage they do!

If you don’t factor in the prevailing satanism, you won’t understand the reason why they always lie. if you have a glimpse of god’s adversary, then you must ask yourself why should he omit any area of ​​science, religion, politics, etc. and not use it to destroy what god created. it’s everywhere, practically everything is a lie, yes it’s ridiculously obvious and people are purposely scared so they can’t ask the normal questions. the example of a very big lie is the globe. just calculate the peripheral speed at the so-called equator and think about the result. OK.! it’s so easy.

Challenge accepted, see here.
https://wtyl.info/challenge-accepted/
I have available to me all the facilities to test the claims, I can guarantee you though that this is another Lanka Grift and there is no money to pay for the actual research.
This is an attempt to save their imploding “viruses aren’t real” business model.

This Microscope (the instrument) can see (image something using electrons instead of photons) down to Individual atoms (the basic unit of a chemical element).

When light (photon energy) hits the retina (a light-sensitive layer of tissue at the back of the eye), special cells called photoreceptors turn the light into electrical signals. These electrical signals travel from the retina through the optic nerve to the brain. Then the brain turns the signals into the images you see.

You cannot see atoms because the instrument you use to imagine with is not designed to create imagines from electrons. In the future they might redesign the eye to do this and then you will be able to image atoms. In the meantime you will have to rely on the election microscope instrument to create imagines of atoms.

Proof: “evidence or argument establishing or helping to establish a fact or the truth of a statement.”

The evidence available to support the reality of the items you’ve listed is in sufficient abundance to establish proof. It is also there for you to examine and come to your own conclusions.

The elite criminals, those euphemistically referred to as the “global elite”, are waging a global war against us. We, the little people from the street, are under attack. It is only our side that is being injured, killed and murdered. The only way we, the little people, will win this war is to set aside our differences, come together as one and fight with a common vision and direction.

It seems all of those posting here are natural allies in this war. Instead of this petty infighting, how about recognizing our enemy are all those ramming this tyranny of Technocracy and Transhumanism down our throats. Let’s come together and win this war first. We can get back to our petty bickering once we have accomplished that and then have nothing better to do with our time.

The Doctrine of the Assumption

“Assumption, in Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic theology, the notion or (in Roman Catholicism) the doctrine that Mary, the mother of Jesus, was taken (assumed) into heaven, body and soul, following the end of her life on Earth. There is no mention of the Assumption in the New Testament, although various texts are frequently adduced to demonstrate the appropriateness of the doctrine, the imagery of which is related to the Ascension of Jesus into heaven. Theologically, the doctrine means that Mary’s redemption involved a glorification of her complete personality and anticipated the state promised to the rest of humankind.”

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Assumption-Christianity

There is no record in the sacred texts to support this teaching. It is a theological theory. Its proponents simply accept that it happened based on their reasoning. Again, there is no written testimony of any witness to this alleged event having ever occurred. Thus, some theologians accept it without evidence and teach it as doctrine.

It is dogma, and “all Dogmas are Doctrine, but not all Doctrine is Dogma. Examples of Dogmas: Papal Infallibility, the divinity of Christ, the Immaculate Conception, the Assumption of Mary and the real Presence of the Eucharist.”

https://slmedia.org/blog/deacon-structing-doctrine-part-1-doctrine-vs-dogma

Definition of dogma:

“a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true.”

So dogma is validated by authority. All that is required is for authority to put the stamp of approval on the teaching and that makes it incontrovertibly true. No evidence is necessary, simply the proclamation by the authority is sufficient to make it unable to be denied or disputed – end of conversation. Anyone who opposes any religious doctrine is simply a heretic and will be shown the instruments. If the heretic does not repent then he will be subjected to the use of the instruments in an attempt to convince him of his error.

Let us consider a doctrine from another religion.

Germ Theory of Disease

“The germ theory of disease is the currently accepted scientific theory for many diseases. It states that microorganisms known as pathogens or “germs” can lead to disease.” – Wikipedia.

Germ theory is the accepted scientific theory or doctrine in the religion of virology. And in scrutinizing religious activity we find it usually centers around temples. Within the temples of religion you will find the teachers of those doctrines unique to that particular religion for which the temple was constructed and serves as the place of worship for its devotees.

The following is a list of the major temples currently providing services for the religion of virology:

Harvard University

Baylor College of Medicine

Case Western Reserve University

Stanford University

University of Cambridge

Cornell University

University of Zurich

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

University of Texas, Health Science Center

Quinnipiac University

University of California

University of Florida

Clemson University

Johns Hopkins University

All of these holy houses teach their doctrine on the basis of an assumption and they are supported by governments, most of whom have been elected by the people. This means that the people themselves bear a responsibility for the consequences of believing what they are taught.

The germ theory of disease has been disproved in a variety of ways, but this has never been officially accepted. The priests of virology will not hear of it. Their official position is that it is not subject to dispute and cannot be denied. They have even aligned themselves with the sorcerers, otherwise known as the pharmaceutical companies, and the false prophets, otherwise known as the mainstream media corporations, so they can altogether decieve the masses and profit from their ignorance while causing death and injury.

“For they that lead this people cause them to err; and they that are led of them are destroyed.” – Isaiah:9:16.