After “isolating” the influenza A “virus” in 1934 and supposedly “isolating” it again on tissue culture and egg membrane in 1937, Thomas Francis Jr. was back in 1940 to perform more grotesque serial passages of ground up chemically altered diseased animal tissue goo from one animal into another. He must have decided that the perfect… Continue reading Did Thomas Francis Jr. Isolate Influenza B in 1940?
“Viral” load is a common measure that one often hears about from the CDC/WHO/MSM when discussing “Covid-19” and disease severity. It is considered an estimation of the amount of “virus” that is within a person’s body fluid. This is primarily determined through calculations based off the Cycle Threshold (Ct) Value from a PCR test. Virologists… Continue reading “Viral” Load of Crap
“WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.“ https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-2021-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users-2020-05… Continue reading PCR and the Prevalence Problem
The Infectious Disease Society of America and the Association for Molecular Pathology released a joint statement in March 2021 about the PCR Test Ct Values which has given even more reasons not to trust any PCR result for this or any other “pandemic.” Together, they inadvertently destroy any argument for the use of PCR as… Continue reading The IDSA and AMP Joint Statement Destroying PCR Tests
For those who don’t know how they determine someone positive for “Coronavirus” using the PCR test, it is not done with a binary + or – result like a pregnancy test. They determine positivity using an arbitrary (random) number called the Ct (cycle threshold) value. What is the Ct value? Ct Value: the number of… Continue reading PCR Ct Values: Arbitrary & Meaningless
“In Silico: in or on a computer : done or produced by using computer software or simulation“ https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/in%20silico I won’t go into too much detail regarding the Drosten PCR test as it was covered beautifully by people much better suited than I (linked below), but I would be remiss if I did not mention it… Continue reading Drosten “SARS-COV-2” PCR Paper
1. No PCR test has been validated against the gold standard of a purified/isolated “SARS-COV-2.” “RT-PCR assays in the UK have analytical sensitivity and specificity of greater than 95%, BUT NO SINGLE GOLD STANDARD ASSAY EXISTS. 1” Diverging for a moment to look at the citation: “No test gives a 100% accurate result; TESTS NEED… Continue reading 20 Undeniable Facts about PCR Tests
It is obvious if one were to look at this situation critically and logically that there has never been a “viral” pandemic. This has been and always will be a TESTING pandemic. So how does one create a testing pandemic without a “virus”? 1. Claim the same old detox symptoms which people go through each… Continue reading The Testing Pandemic