The Case Against Antibodies

Putting the “Antibody” Hypothesis on Trial The deeper I looked into the methods of virology, a fundamental question began to take shape. If “viruses” had never been properly purified and isolated directly from host fluids in order to be independently manipulated and studied, how were “antibodies,” said to be anywhere from two to thirty times… Continue reading The Case Against Antibodies

Corona Cross-Reactivity

Let’s be specific. According to the mainstream narrative, “antibodies” are proteins that react to antigens—substances identified as foreign, such as toxins, proteins, peptides, or polysaccharides. The prevailing pseudoscientific hypothesis claims that each “antibody” binds to a specific antigen, like a lock and key. In the case of “SARS-COV-2,” “antibodies” said to be specific to the spike protein… Continue reading Corona Cross-Reactivity

The Antibody™

“It would be absurd to imagine that the mechanical diagrams have any representation in the world of fact. They are figments of the imagination and may serve some useful purpose as picture books serve in teaching a child the alphabet.” Henry Smith Williams and James Beveridge in the 1915 book The Mechanism of Immunization When I originally went… Continue reading The Antibody™

Köhler and Milstein’s Monoclonal Antibody Monstrosity (1975)

When I began my journey into the world of “antibodies,” I was rather shocked by the complete lack of direct scientific evidence that these entities actually existed and functioned as described. Like most, I assumed that what we were told about “antibodies” and the “immune” system was built upon solid scientific evidence. However, what I… Continue reading Köhler and Milstein’s Monoclonal Antibody Monstrosity (1975)

Merrill Chase Inadvertently Disproved Antibodies in 1942

When I first began uncovering the fraud of virology, I was still somehow convinced that there was such a thing as an “immune system” that utilized substances called “antibodies” in order to protect us from outside pathogens. While I understood that vaccination was dangerous due to the toxic recipes used in their creation, my counter to those… Continue reading Merrill Chase Inadvertently Disproved Antibodies in 1942

The Chemical Structure of Antibodies?

People don’t realize that molecules themselves are somewhat hypothetical, and that their interactions are more so, and that the biological reactions are even more so. -Kary Mullis Rodney Porter and Gerald Edelman share the credit for “discovering” the chemical structure of the unseen and entirely theoretical antibodies said to provide some form of immunity from… Continue reading The Chemical Structure of Antibodies?

Was the First Atomic Resolution Structure of an Antibody Fragment Published in 1973?

Over a year-and-a-half ago, I did a deep dive into the history of antibodies by following multiple timelines which highlighted the important dates, studies, and discoveries throughout the century which led to the current prevalent antibody theory. Most of the research I did back then has already been added to this site while a few… Continue reading Was the First Atomic Resolution Structure of an Antibody Fragment Published in 1973?

The Clonal Selection Antibody Theory (1957)

Immunology does not suffer from a lack of experimental data, but still some of the most elementary questions are undecided, and it is not yet possible to choose between instructive and elective theories.” Joshua Ledergerg, Genes and Antibodies https://doi.org/10.1126/science.129.3364.1649 Every scientific theory relies on the scientific method. A scientist may make an observation and devise a… Continue reading The Clonal Selection Antibody Theory (1957)

The Natural Selection Theory of Antibody Formation (1955)

Such a scientist does not allow himself to be blocked by inconvenient facts or by the confusing life of the laboratory. Such a scientist can attain the sublime through science by abstracting from concrete details, thereby reaching out to universal connections, and by putting his personal imprint on the world” -Niels Jerne http://brunolemaitre.ch/narcissism-science/testp-page/ Jerne never… Continue reading The Natural Selection Theory of Antibody Formation (1955)

The Indirect Template Theory of Antibody Production (1949)

From 1900 to 1949, there were two main competing theories attempting to explain antibody production and formation as they had never been purified nor isolated directly from the fluids and proven to exist. Antibodies were still unseen fictional creations assumed to be within the blood acting as defenders against invading pathogens, thus researchers needed to… Continue reading The Indirect Template Theory of Antibody Production (1949)

Antibodies, Plasma, and the Power of Correlation

There is a real problem in the sciences that goes far beyond the methods and experiments. It is a deeper issue that has more to do with the very ideology used by the researchers themselves which permeates throughout much of the scientific literature. It is this idea that finding indirect evidence of assumed particles or… Continue reading Antibodies, Plasma, and the Power of Correlation

Direct Template and the Theoretical Structure of Antibodies (1930-1940)

I found that Landsteiner and I had a much different approach to science: Landsteiner would ask, ‘What do these experimental observations force us to believe about the nature of the world?’ and I would ask, ‘What is the most simple, general and intellectually satisfying picture of the world that encompasses these observations and is not… Continue reading Direct Template and the Theoretical Structure of Antibodies (1930-1940)

The Antibody Equation (1929)

It is very apparent to anyone looking into the origins of antibodies that the idea of what these entities are in terms of how they look and how they function came well before any attempts to actually purify, isolate, and characterize the assumed particles. Antibodies were (and still are) nothing more than unseen theoretical constructs… Continue reading The Antibody Equation (1929)

Paul Ehrlich’s Side-Chain Antibody Theory (1900) Part 2: The Complement System

For of course it would be absurd to imagine that the mechanical diagrams have any representation in the world of fact. They are figments of the imagination, and may serve some useful purpose as picture books serve in teaching a child the alphabet. But as the time comes when the child puts aside the blocks… Continue reading Paul Ehrlich’s Side-Chain Antibody Theory (1900) Part 2: The Complement System

Paul Ehrlich’s Side-Chain Antibody Theory (1900) Part 1

In 1900, Paul Ehrlich, considered the “Father of Chemotherapy,” took a shot at creating a theoretical explanation for how immunity occurs inside the human body. According to Ehrlich’s Nobel Prize biography, while working with Behring’s anti-diphtheria serum, Ehrlich was said to have standardized this serum in units related to a fixed and invariable standard. Previously,… Continue reading Paul Ehrlich’s Side-Chain Antibody Theory (1900) Part 1

Emil Von Behring’s Diphtheria/Tetanus Papers (1890): Precursor to Antibodies

Emil Von Behring is considered the “Father of Immunology” which creates some confusion as Edward Jenner is also considered the “Father of Immunology.” Either Immunology has two daddies or you can pick whichever one you like best I suppose. In any case, it was Behring’s work that created the hypothesis that there were certain components… Continue reading Emil Von Behring’s Diphtheria/Tetanus Papers (1890): Precursor to Antibodies

Beware the Snake Oil Salesmen

“My story has never been to create fear, panic, and anxiety about water.” He said he told Peters that he believes “there’s actually a snake venom connection to all of COVID-19, and I think that’s the weapon.” – Dr. Bryan Ardis https://www.thedailybeast.com/covid-conspiracy-theorists-are-at-war-over-snake-venom Summarizing his theory, Dr. Ardis said, “They are using Krait venom and Cobra… Continue reading Beware the Snake Oil Salesmen

Antibody Specificity?

“No, there is no such thing as a monoclonal antibody that, because it is monoclonal, recognizes only one protein or only one virus. It will bind to any protein having the same (or a very similar) sequence.” -Clifford Saper, one of the world’s leading authorities on monoclonal antibodies, Harvard Medical School professor https://off-guardian.org/2021/03/06/the-antibody-deception/ One of… Continue reading Antibody Specificity?

The Antibody Mess: Contradictions and Confusion

Illustration by Peter Hamlin.;

SEROCONVERSION: The development of detectable antibodies in the blood that are directed against an infectious agent. https://www.medicinenet.com/seroconversion/definition.htm Antibodies are supposed to be a sign that one has fought off an infection. These tiny unseen theoretical proteins are supposed to attach to the “virus” and clear it out of the body while leaving behind an army… Continue reading The Antibody Mess: Contradictions and Confusion

Antibodies Are Not Required For Immunity

It is very important to understand that when the scientific community and the MSM talk about antibodies, they are speaking about particles never proven to exist. Like “viruses,” antibodies have never been purified/isolated directly from humans nor have they been EM imaged from completely purified samples where these tiny proteins are separated from everything else.… Continue reading Antibodies Are Not Required For Immunity

The Reproducibility Crisis in Antibody Research

Over the last few decades, it has been shown that there is a huge reproducibility crisis going on in the sciences. This was brilliantly pointed out by John Ioannidis, a very well-respected physician/scientist and professor at Stanford, who concluded in a 2005 essay he wrote that most of the published scientific literature is wrong. One… Continue reading The Reproducibility Crisis in Antibody Research

FDA and the CDC Destroy Antibody Testing and Immunity

If you want more evidence that unproven theoretical antibody measurements are absolutely useless, it’s always fun to go directly to the accepted mainstream sources themselves. Many times, you can find very revealing nuggets of information buried within their releases. This information tends to contradict the claims they make publicly. Case in point, the claim that… Continue reading FDA and the CDC Destroy Antibody Testing and Immunity

Antibodies: No Correlation of Protection

“Neither an immune correlate of protection nor of the duration of protection has been established to date.” -WHO on “SARS-COV-2” vaccine immunity October 4th, 2021 https://www.who.int/news/item/04-10-2021-interim-statement-on-booster-doses-for-covid-19-vaccination In order for antibodies to have any usefulness as a measurement of protection, it must be established how many antibodies are needed for protection. This is supposedly determined by a… Continue reading Antibodies: No Correlation of Protection

Do Antibodies Equal Protection? They Don’t Know.

“We do have tests to measure antibodies. In theory, you could even measure virus, neutralizing antibodies in a specialty lab, but that’s not easy to do in a high-throughput way. We do not have what we call a true correlate of protection. We do not have a blood test or even a series of blood… Continue reading Do Antibodies Equal Protection? They Don’t Know.