The Variant Game: Fool Them Thrice…?

I tend to stay away from acknowledging variants much as it should be clear since “SARS-COV-2” was never properly purified/isolated directly from a sick host and therefore never proven to exist, that the variants of this non-existent “virus” also do not exist. The hysteria is akin to being terrified of a Word document containing random… Continue reading The Variant Game: Fool Them Thrice…?

From Polio to “SARS-COV-2:” Repeating the Vaccine Mistakes of the Past

“We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes.” Dr. Eric Rubin on the FDA panel deciding on whether to give the “SARS-COV-2”  vaccines approval for 5-11-year-olds https://townhall.com/tipsheet/scottmorefield/2021/10/26/fda-panel-member-were-never-gonna-learn-about-how-safe-the-vaccine-is-until-we-start-giving-it-n2598090 “That’s just the way it goes.” Just accept it. We need to give ourselves and… Continue reading From Polio to “SARS-COV-2:” Repeating the Vaccine Mistakes of the Past

Non-Human Primate “SARS-COV-2” Animal Model Study (2020)

“Since no animal model fully reproduces every aspect of COVID-19, it is necessary to weigh the strengths and weaknesses of each according to the goals of the study.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023231/#__ffn_sectitle The above statement from a June 2021 article on the status of animal models for “SARS-COV-2” showcases the giant glaring elephant in the room: to date,… Continue reading Non-Human Primate “SARS-COV-2” Animal Model Study (2020)

Published
Categorized as SARS-COV-2

Drosten “SARS-COV-2” PCR Paper

“In Silico: in or on a computer : done or produced by using computer software or simulation“ https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/in%20silico I won’t go into too much detail regarding the Drosten PCR test as it was covered beautifully by people much better suited than I (linked below), but I would be remiss if I did not mention it… Continue reading Drosten “SARS-COV-2” PCR Paper

CDC “SARS-COV-2” Paper (2020)

On March 7, 2020, the CDC released their study on the “isolation” and characterization of “SARS-COV-2” from the first US patient identified by PCR testing on January 22nd, 2020. As with every single paper before it, the CDC relies on unpurified cell cultures to claim “isolation” of a new “Coronavirus.” They utilize the same unproven… Continue reading CDC “SARS-COV-2” Paper (2020)

Published
Categorized as SARS-COV-2

Park “SARS-COV-2” Paper (2020)

“We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.” Replying Author: Wan Beom Park https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/ This paper is often cited by many as proof that “SARS-COV-2” exists and has been “isolated” from a sick patient. The problem is, they only read the title of the study. Had they read the study itself,… Continue reading Park “SARS-COV-2” Paper (2020)

Published
Categorized as SARS-COV-2

Zhu “SARS-COV-2” Paper (2020)

“[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones.” -Replying Author: Wenjie Tan https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/ The Zhu study gets the infamous distinction for not only acknowledging that they did not fulfill Koch’s Postulates, the logic-based criteria needed to be met in order to prove a microorganism causes disease, but also for admitting that they… Continue reading Zhu “SARS-COV-2” Paper (2020)

Published
Categorized as SARS-COV-2