AntiViral Ep. 1: Virology — A Critique of Its Foundations
AntiViral Series

AntiViral Ep. 1: Virology — A Critique of Its Foundations

Mike Stone
Published on October 2, 2025

Where science ends, pseudoscience begins.

Welcome to the first episode of the AntiViral series. Since this is the beginning, I thought it best to start with the core arguments against germ “theory” and virology—especially for newcomers. It’s striking how many who attack this position don’t actually understand its fundamentals.

Here are the basics introduced in this first episode (video embedded below):

  • Germ “theory” is a falsified hypothesis. Pasteur, Koch, and others failed to prove any bacteria “pathogenic” using logical evidence derived from the scientific method.
  • The “virus” concept was invented as a workaround to avoid the evidence that had already falsified the germ “theory.”
  • Virologists have never purified and isolated particles presumed to be “viruses” prior to experimentation in order to use them as an independent variable and establish causation.
  • Instead, they assume a “virus” is present in unpurified fluids from sick hosts, never purify or isolate it, and mix these fluids with a cocktail of substances—fetal bovine serum, antibiotics, animal or aborted fetal cells, chemicals, etc.
  • They then point to an artificial, lab-created effect (the cytopathic effect, or CPE) as “proof” that a “virus” was present and caused cell death.
  • Their reasoning relies heavily on logical fallacies such as begging the question, affirming the consequent, and false cause fallacies (more on this in Episode Two).
  • From this flawed set-up, virologists lean on indirect evidence—electron microscope images, genomic data, “antibody” testing, and animal torture—to infer the existence of “viruses.”
  • Yet they have never provided direct evidence, through the scientific method and Koch’s Postulates, proving that such entities exist, cause disease, and can transmit between humans.

The result: virology is not science but pseudoscience, built on a false foundation.

This is just the beginning. If you’d like to go deeper into the arguments against germ “theory” and virology, my article Intro to ViroLIEgy expands on these points with more detail and references.

Welcome to ViroLIEgy.

About the Author(s)

M

Mike Stone

1 Response

R

Roland Sassen

When people learn about the DNA delusion they will understand that viruses do not exist. You can read about this delusion here: https://thinsia.gumroad.com/l/life

Leave a Reply

Support ViroLIEgy

If you’d like to support ViroLIEgy.com, please use either the link or the QR code. Your donation is greatly appreciated! Every contribution helps keep the site running and allows us to continue questioning the narrative with logic and critical thinking. Thank you for your support!

Donate via PayPal
PayPal Donation QR Code