A Critical Analysis From the very beginning of my research into virology’s claims, my priority has been to examine the foundational evidence for the existence of “pathogenic viruses.” Rather than relying on external critiques, I chose to analyze virology’s own literature, exposing its pseudoscientific methods using the field’s own work. My approach has been to… Continue reading “Virus-like” Particles
“It would be absurd to imagine that the mechanical diagrams have any representation in the world of fact. They are figments of the imagination and may serve some useful purpose as picture books serve in teaching a child the alphabet.” Henry Smith Williams and James Beveridge in the 1915 book The Mechanism of Immunization When I originally went… Continue reading The Antibody™
This article originally appeared on ViroLIEgy’s Antiviral Substack. Imagine for a moment that you had no concept of Santa Claus. You have never heard of the jolly fat man in the red jumpsuit who delivers presents to all of the good boys and girls around the world. You wake up one morning, walk downstairs, and… Continue reading The Indirect Approach
Art:something that is created with imagination and skill and that is beautiful or that expresses important ideas or feelings https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/art I was recently made aware of an article by Dr. Peter McCullough which supposedly contained “difficult to deny” evidence for the existence of “SARS-COV-2.” This evidence was supposed to shut up those of us who… Continue reading Dr. McCullough’s Works of Art
They say that “a picture is worth a thousand words” and that “seeing is believing.” When it comes to “viruses,” these pictures come in the form of Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) imaging. These are the scary depictions of the brightly colored and digitally enhanced particles you see plastered all over the media selling you on… Continue reading “SARS-COV-2” TEM Images: Game Over
In 1967, June Almeida presented a paper supposedly showing the first EM images of the “coronavirus” structure. These images were published two years after D.A. Tyrrell discovered the B814 strain in 1965 and a year after Dorothy Hamre discovered strain 229E in 1966. The samples that Almeida used to characterize the previously unseen “viruses” were… Continue reading June Almeida And The First “Coronavirus” EM Images (1967)
It should be clear to anyone being intellectually honest that purification (free of foreign material, contaminants, pollutants, etc.) and isolation (separated from everything else) of particles believed to be a “virus” is essential and can not be skipped. Without separating the assumed “viral” particles from everything else in the sample, there is no way for… Continue reading Misinterpreting Electron Microscope Images
There are many subcellular structures that can be confused with “viruses” in TEM images. These consist of coated vesicles, multivesicular bodies, exosomes, golgi and costomer-coated vesicles, etc. These structures/particles are sure to be within the sample as virologists fail to properly purify (free of foreign matter, pollutants, contaminants, etc.) and isolate (separated from everything else)… Continue reading The Mimickers of “SARS-COV-2”
A huge problem for Virologists is that there is no way that they can claim what they present as evidence of a “virus” has any relation to natural particles that occur in vivo, or within a living organism. The various cell-altering chemicals/antibiotics and foreign animal RNA that is subsequently mixed together with the original unpurified… Continue reading The Numerous Alterations During Sample Preparation for EM Imaging
One of the “proofs” people try to offer in support of “SARS-COV-2” or any other “virus” is that pictures of these particles exist. They assume that since we can see images of these “viruses,” this means that they must be real. The images referred to are normally Transmission Electron Microscope images taken from cell cultures.… Continue reading Electron Microscope Imagery: “Virus” Proof or Refutation?
Exposing the lies of germ theory and virology using their own sources.
Copyright © 2026 All Right Reserved ViroLIEgy
Disclaimer: The information on this site is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice.
We are an awward winning multinational & company We believe in quality and standard worldwide company.
