Documenting the “Virus” Lie

Watching a good documentary and/or presentation can be an engaging, insightful, and eye-opening experience for many people. It is an easy way to disseminate a lot of invaluable information in a visually pleasing way. For me, the HIV documentary House of Numbers was life-changing. It was brilliantly done and completely destroyed the HIV=AIDS dogma and ultimately helped me to understand the “virus” lie. I’ve known others who were convinced to immediately stop vaccinating themselves and their children due to watching the intense information and experiences presented in the Vaxxed series. These documentaries may be just what someone needs to see in order to start their own journey into questioning the massive fraud that has been perpetrated on us for the last few centuries. As with other lists, I plan to update this page as I become aware of other relevant documentaries and presentations that can be helpful. I hope you are able to find something of value here. I know I have.

House of Numbers

The Emperors New Virus? – An Analysis of the Evidence for the Existence of HIV (Documentary)

Germs Debunk Corona

Fauci’s First Fraud

Covid-19 Immunity in 19 Minutes

The End of Germ Theory

Anatomy of COVID-19 by Dr. Andrew Kaufman

The Rooster in the River of Rats

Virology Is Way Past Its ‘Cell’ by Date

The Myth Of Contagion, a discussion with T.C. Fry

Hippocratic Hypocrisy

Virus And mRNA Theory Officially Over!

Virology Debunks Corona

The Science of Panic

Vaxxed

Vaxxed II: The People’s Truth

The Viral Delusion

A brand new 6 part docu-series called The Viral Delusion is set to release soon. You can catch the trailer at the site where you will also be able to find all of the episodes. I have been anxiously awaiting the release of this series and knowing the creators involved, you will not be disappointed!

https://paradigmshift.uscreen.io/?via=mike

Terrain: The Film

Dr. Andrew Kaufman teamed up with filmmaker Marcelina Cravat for this recently released 2-part feature film. You can find access to the documentary with the link below:

https://terrainthefilm.com/

The Dimming

I’m also including The Dimming here as well as many people ask me, if not a “virus,” what could possibly be making people sick? While I believe there is no one cause and that there are multiple factors which contribute to disease, a major factor in respiratory disease is air pollution. Persistent contrails, a.k.a chemtrails, are a huge part of the problem and this documentary is an excellent look at this important threat to our health.

FrankenSkies

Another excellent documentary about our current air pollution threat.

36 comments

  1. Thanks Mike, great compilation. Like you, watching House of Numbers in early 2020 was a real eye opener. I lost a dear friend to “AIDS” in the mid-80’s. A healthy man, tested positive, started treatment (most likely AZT) and dead in six months. I blame Fauci for his death.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. You are welcome Lynn! I’m sorry to hear about your friend. I blame Fauci, Gallo, Montagnier, and anyone else in a prominent position that knew better but continued to sell the lie. I hope more people watch HON as it had a huge impact on me.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. House of Numbers is truly fantastic, and all the supplementary interviews on the House of Numbers youtune channel round out the information wonderfully.

    The following is just an interview not a documentary, but the content is found nowhere else I’m aware of except other OMSJ interviews and their website:

    “In every single case where we have forced these [infectious disease] experts to testify honestly [in criminal HIV-AIDS cases], we have either forced them to admit that they don’t know what they’re talking about or basically impeached them [as expert witnesses].”

    [Including the prosecution’s lead expert witness in an HIV case who is in charge of HIV policy for the entire state of Indiana.] “[In over 50 HIV cases] we have not found one single [infectious disease] expert who can competently testify under oath under penalty of perjury.”

    This interview is with is the guy who got HIV offenses removed from the law books for the entire US military. Court is a great place to overturn bad science…if you know the right questions to ask.

    “We know the religion better than the other side’s experts do…When we get them in court, they recoil like vampires in church.”

    Liked by 1 person

    1. That is an awesome quote and one that is very accurate. Their evidence falls apart upon critical examination and their true colors show as they quickly look like bumbling idiots trying to explain/defend the lie.

      Like

  3. Here’s another talk I suspect most here won’t have seen, showing that a related theory for plants – “the insect theory of disease” – also does not hold. At least in its strong version.

    It perfectly echoes the fact that elite-healthy humans do not succumb to nature’s waste disposal brigade of microbes.

    The parallels even extend to economics, and I could link Tom Woods’ classic talk Why You’ve Never Heard of the Great Depression of 1921, in which he explains how depressions (much like colds!) are miraculously beneficial (and brief) if not interfered with. Quantitative easing is of course like popping an aspirin (or Ivermectin/HCQ). The capital structure gets increasingly deranged as QE continues, much as the body resorts to “autoimmune” diseases or cancer if colds are repeatedly suppressed with drugs and food.

    We even see the parallel in overaggressive firefighting. It applies to every natural order (a.k.a. spontaneous order) that F.A. Hayek wrote about.

    Liked by 1 person

      1. Viewing it from a terrain theory lens, do you think the elephant dung beetle eggs come from the microzyma or its derivative present in the dung?

        Like

    1. Brilliant links and added bonuses to an already invaluable compilation by Mike Stone.
      I would surmise that all animal dis-eases come from the same man made sources as every other source. Man-kind needs to awaken and awaken fast! Thank you for this comment, and Mike as always.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Hi Mike, great work as usual. Loved how Dr. Tom Cowan gave you a mention in one of his talks with the โ€œvisit mike stone, well not him personally but his site ViroLIEgyโ€ ๐Ÿ˜‚
    A small favor to ask, many of the documentaries will not play, could you put a link also after them to watch them on the original site. Great work.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. You kept your word! This is a good collection. HoN is the biggest eye opener to most and dr. Eleni’s matter of fact tone of speech was the most appealing to me – sticking to facts – no emotion or name calling or complaining.

    Vaxxed focused on safety aspect though it was still assuming vax is effective/needed – my biggest disappointment with RFK/Del crowd. I can understand it – though not condone it.

    The insect one and TC Fry are new to me (latter appears muted and not able to unmute it)

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I just fixed the T.C. Fry interview. Are there any other links not working for you? I may have to switch others. I agree with you on Vaxxed. While it shows the dangers of vaccination, it still subscribes to the “virus” lie and that they can somehow be made safer. I included it to help people question the effectiveness and safety of vaccination. Hopefully they won’t fall into the RFK/Bigtree limited hangout.

      Like

  6. I had forgotten where I saw about Act up – now this reminds me -Its Fauci’s First Fraud. I’d encourage everyone to watch this to understand the deviousness of these companies like Wellcome. They astroturfed a protest organization to generate demand for AZT. In addition to pushing it based on false tests, they made the already suffering folks demand and do protests to force the hand of FDA to approve AZT. That’s psychopathic and criminal. This made me skeptical of any NGO funded by such companies.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Just watched the House of Numbers Mike, a very good documentary however I was hoping to see another former virologist Dr Stefan Lanka comment here. Not to worry though as the evidence gained here alone should bury this theory. Coming from Africa I have been in close contact with these poor people myself and k re there was something wrong. It was only when I immigrated to the UK that I could dig deeper and connect to people in the know that answers started coming to surface – a wicked bunch that tell these lies.
    A good compilation Mike, keep it up, you have all my support mate.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for the kind words and support! Was Dr. Lanka not in House of Numbers? I haven’t watched it in a while but I could have sworn that is where I first saw him. I wish there was a documentary focused specifically on Dr. Lanka, his work, and the measles trial. It would be very eye-opening to many.

      Like

  8. The Thomas Dykstra presentation I posted above that debunks the “insect theory of plant disease” points the way toward a generalization of symbiotic and predatory relations in ecosystems, which provides a full and final holistic justification for why the germ theory of disease is unlikely, rather than having to treat it as a mysterious special case.

    As a special case it draws critiques like, “Nature has many predatory relationships, so why would germs be an exception? Why are *all* germs good? Surely some of them must be opportunistic at least sometimes.” The implication being that a blanket dismissal of pathogenic microbes lacks nuance, when the reality is the mainstream view lacks a broad understanding of ecosystemic relationships.

    The generalizing principle I speak of is as follows:

    ๐˜ž๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข ๐˜ด๐˜ถ๐˜ง๐˜ง๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜บ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ, ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜บ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜บ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ.

    That is, every entity that lives in a given ecosystem plays a useful role in the preservation of that particular ecosystem. (I’ll address the matter of “new residents” later on in this comment.) We will see that it is crucial to keep careful track of which ecosystem we are talking about in each moment of the analysis, as there are ecosystems within ecosystems.

    Each animal and plant is itself an ecosystem. Thus the principle states that all microbes living in the terrain of the tissues of the body are helpful, as is every microbe living inside plant flesh.

    However, when we zoom out from the micro-ecosystem of a single plant or animal, though, we find that – for example – certain insects *do* attack certain plants. The “some relationships are symbiotic and some are predatory” idea does apply at this higher level of analysis.

    The key is the attacking insects don’t live within the tissues of the plant, so they are not part of the plant’s internal micro-ecosystem but rather the larger ecosystem of a forest, jungle, or other biome.

    Within that larger ecosystem, the insects serve a helpful purpose, breaking down deficient plant tissue – as the presentation above shows they only attack unhealthy plants – so that more things more suited to the environment can grow and thrive and thereby strengthen the ecosystem as a whole. Insects may eat up their whole food source, but they never eat up their *home* or their ecosystem itself.

    In the same way, bacteria in the human body could at a stretch be called “predatory” if we were to zoom in to the cellular level, where maybe a cell is still alive but in poor health and a bacterium comes along and ruthlessly eats it, but it is not predatory at the level of the body itself – that is, it has no design to take over or eat the body or any of its healthy tissue or in any way to work toward the body’s decline. If bacteria worked this way, as someone’s quote said, there’d be no one alive to believe it.

    So there’s the answer to, “Why are germs NEVER predatory?” They are, just not at the level of analysis the germ theorist assumes. They prey on dead or dying cells; they don’t prey on their own habitat itself!

    Essentially the idea that germ theory must be true is a category error. The zoom level is wrong.

    The notion that a germ is like a deer or an insect, a visitor that can ravage a healthy or sick plant, respectively, is wrong simply because a germ doesn’t visit the body and eat at it. It lives in the body, even if it once came from outside. The average lifespan of a bacterium is around 12 hours. They divide every 12 minutes to 24 hours. The model of a bacterium visiting and eating healthy tissue, or even of killing an unhealthy human, makes no sense. How could that be a good long-term reproductive strategy compared to simply eating dead or dying tissue for the person? Besides, the human is already a “full motel” of germs that will crowd out any new microbe that doesn’t fill a niche for which there was demand.

    The existing microflora also have the benefit of ages of deeply woven synergistic relationship-building within that habitat. A new microbe (if indeed there are unique microbes, pace microzyma theory) would have to be so uniquely and urgently needed for a bizarre job in the body that no existing microbe could fill the role.

    In this way nature is extraordinarily harmonious and reaches full harmony at sufficient levels of ecosystem maturity (macroscopic animals and plants, as ancient ecosystems composed of trillions of lifeforms mostly with very short life cycles, being the pinnacle example), but that harmony is at the level of each overarching ecosystem, leaving predation or quasi-predation as an option in the interaction of its constituents – this predation being helpful for the ecosystem as a whole, and being generally (or exclusively, if the ecosystem is mature enough) “predation” of unhealthy or dying constituents.

    Circling back to the germ theorist’s objection one more time, “Deer attack healthy plants, and maybe I could believe bugs only attack unhealthy plants, yet you’re saying microbes NEVER attack even unhealthy plants or animals? Isn’t that an irrationally extreme position?” No, because the germ theorist is mixing up their zoom levels. I will grant that this still might allow for some final predation at end of life, and indeed we hear stories of ants getting parasites that trick birds into eating them by puffing their rears up to look like berries, as the parasite apparently has a life cycle spanning ant and bird phases, but I suspect this may just be a fancy way to due that has benefits for the ant colony (indeed it might be telling that ants are like one distributed organism in many ways).

    There are many more phenomena I think this principle elucidates, but one that often comes up by germ theory supporters is food poisoning.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. It is really amazing how much of the modern stone age medical system is based in pure BS. I believe big pharma drugs, vaccines and mRNA injections kill more people than any disease. Thanks for putting all this in one place.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uNoijuXDg5tzstEuaxtOrYv3fZ0Nyc405_thJY4-BBg/edit?fbclid=IwAR1dwAg33ZMuaviaueSqjybliCmbDBuA1wXCv83fSway4jSE9O5lUndNGsY#gid=0 these facts should be made available to everyone – this is 100% proof that everything from the beginning was and still is an absolute lie and fraud – I will never understand why people are so easily manipulated and know absolutely nothing about the processes of maintaining the health of their own bodies!
    You make a very good work, thanks!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: