Before the discovery of “viruses,” people believed that disease was caused by bacteria. There were rumblings and murmurs of invisible pathogens hidden within the fluids but most experiments were focused on cultivating bacteria from a diseased host and explaining pathogenesis based on the findings. This was no different for the flu. In 1892, German bacteriologist… Continue reading Richard Shope Swine Flu Paper (1931)
To find the answer to this question, it must first be understood that the disease known as Polio is nothing more than a collection of symptoms which have been given a name. These are the exact same symptoms of disease commonly seen with the flu as well as other ailments. The only “major difference” is… Continue reading Was Polio Conquered?
As a final nail in the coffin to the claims of purification/isolation of the Polio “virus,” for the “safety and effectiveness” of the Salk Polio vaccine, as well as the purification methods of Carlton Schwerdt (who it was later admitted only achieved purity of 10% of the “virus”), I present two studies from 1961, which… Continue reading Was Polio Ever Properly Purified and Isolated? Part Three
In 1959, Carlton Schwerdt wrote an in-depth review of the evidence which had been gathered up to that time in relation to the purification and isolation of a Polio “virus.” The paper itself is about 41 pages long and covers everything from the various attempts to achieve purification, the difficulties of “viral” idenfification/characterization by means… Continue reading Was Polio Ever Properly Purified and Isolated?: Part Two
In order to properly purify a “virus,”, the particles must be freed from anything that can contaminate, debase, adulterate, and/or pollute it. To be properly isolated, the particles must be separated from everything else that could potentially be contained within the sample. Without doing this, there would be no certainty that the particles from a… Continue reading Was Polio Ever Properly Purified and Isolated?: Part One
John Franklin Enders, the man responsible for the “isolation” of the Measles “virus” in 1954 using the cell culture process he supposedly perfected, was also heavily involved in Polio research. He was responsible for the cultivation of the Lansing Polio “virus” on non-nervous tissue culture experiments in 1949. Up to that time, Polio was only… Continue reading Enders Polio Paper (1949)
The Lansing strain of Polio is one of three strains used in the Polio vaccine. It was created through the emulsified brain and spinal cord of an 18-year-old boy from Lansing, MI. The emulsified goo was injected into the brains of monkeys which then had their brains and spinal cords emulsified and transferred into other… Continue reading The Lansing Strain of Polio
“What is now proved was once only imagin’d” –William Blake It’s kind of ironic that the above William Blake quote headlined the Rockefeller University’s Research Profile on Simon Flexner seeing how everything virology claims to have “proven” amounts to nothing but pure imagination. Simon Flexner, brother of Abraham Flexner of the infamous Flexner Report, was… Continue reading Flexner’s Polio Paper (1910)
When you look into the history of Polio, you will find that the “discovery” of the Polio “virus” is fraught with insane leaps in logic and assumptions and is replete with grotesquely inhumane experiments. You will find that initially, the spinal column from a deceased nine-year-old boy was ground up and injected directly into the… Continue reading A Brief Overview on the Horrors of Polio Research
“It is obvious that Koch’s Postulates have not been satisfied in viral diseases.” -Thomas Rivers 1937 During the 2003 SARS “epidemic,” the WHO regularly announced updates about their search for the causative agent of what was claimed to be a new disease. On March 27th, 2003, they admitted that the criteria that needed to be… Continue reading Fouchier “SARS-COV-1” Paper (2003): Koch’s Postulates Fulfilled?
This is the final of the four papers used to claim that Koch’s Postulates (four logic-based criteria needed to be met in order to claim a pathogen causes disease), were fulfilled for “SARS-COV-1.” However, as in the other papers used to make this claim, the researchers fail at even fulfilling the first two Postulates. The… Continue reading Ksiazek “SARS-COV-1” Paper (2003)
The Poutanen study/report summarized the initial epidemiologic findings, clinical description, and diagnostic findings for the first probable cases of “SARS” in Canada. This paper was used along with three others as evidence that “SARS-COV-1” fulfilled Koch’s Postulates, a series of four logical requirements developed by Robert Koch in 1890 that were agreed upon by the… Continue reading Poutanen “SARS-COV-1” Paper (2003)
Christian Drosten, a German virologist who helped to create the problematic “SARS-COV-2” PCR test without ever actually seeing a “virus,” was also heavily involved in the original “SARS-COV-1” discovery process. In fact, Drosten was instrumental in setting up the molecular virology methods used today to claim the discovery of novel “viruses” based on genome sequences… Continue reading Drosten “SARS-COV-1” Paper (2003)
On November 16, 2002, the first case of an atypical pneumonia was reported in Guangdong province in the southern part of China. It wasn’t until nearly 4 months later on March 12th, 2003 that the WHO announced a global alert about a severe pneumonia affecting parts of Asia. On March 24th, 2003, a CDC laboratory… Continue reading J.S.M. Peiris “SARS-COV-1” Paper (2003)
John Franklin Enders 1954 paper is considered the definitive proof for the discovery of a measles “virus.” This evidence was presented as the “isolation” of measles and served as the basis for which the vaccine was built upon. It also laid the groundwork for the use of cell culture experiments as a way to cultivate… Continue reading Enders Measles Paper (1954)
“In Silico: in or on a computer : done or produced by using computer software or simulation“ https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/in%20silico I won’t go into too much detail regarding the Drosten PCR test as it was covered beautifully by people much better suited than I (linked below), but I would be remiss if I did not mention it… Continue reading Drosten “SARS-COV-2” PCR Paper
On March 7, 2020, the CDC released their study on the “isolation” and characterization of “SARS-COV-2” from the first US patient identified by PCR testing on January 22nd, 2020. As with every single paper before it, the CDC relies on unpurified cell cultures to claim “isolation” of a new “Coronavirus.” They utilize the same unproven… Continue reading CDC “SARS-COV-2” Paper (2020)
“We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.” -Replying Author: Wan Beom Park https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/ This paper is often cited by many as proof that “SARS-COV-2” exists and has been “isolated” from a sick patient. The problem is, they only read the title of the study. Had they read the study itself,… Continue reading Park “SARS-COV-2” Paper (2020)
“[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones.” -Replying Author: Wenjie Tan https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/ The Zhu study gets the infamous distinction for not only acknowledging that they did not fulfill Koch’s Postulates, the logic-based criteria needed to be met in order to prove a microorganism causes disease, but also for admitting that they… Continue reading Zhu “SARS-COV-2” Paper (2020)
It is clear after having gone through the history of “Coronaviruses” from 1965 up to today, not a single one of these so-called “viruses” has ever been properly purified/isolated directly from a sick patient nor proven pathogenic by fulfilling Koch’s Postulates. They always take the fluid from a sick patient and mix it with animal… Continue reading Zhou “SARS-COV-2” Paper (2020)
Exposing the lies of germ theory and virology using their own sources.
Copyright © 2026 All Right Reserved ViroLIEgy
Disclaimer: The information on this site is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice.
We are an awward winning multinational & company We believe in quality and standard worldwide company.
