In science credit goes to the man who convinces the world, not the man to whom the idea first occurs. -Francis Galton Edward Jenner is considered the “Father of Immunology” for his work with both cowpox and smallpox. While inoculations were known and used before him, Jenner made the case that he could create immunity… Continue reading Edward Jenner’s Smallpox Paper (1798)
“Viruses are microscopic parasites, generally much smaller than bacteria. They lack the capacity to thrive and reproduce outside of a host body. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.livescience.com/amp/53272-what-is-a-virus.html When most people think of “viruses,” they think of invisible floating invaders from outside, which find a way to inhabit the body, taking over host cells, and multiplying out of control until… Continue reading The Human “Virome”
Purification: the act or process of making something pure and free of any contaminating, debasing, or foreign elements https://www.dictionary.com/browse/purification I was not planning on doing any more articles nor devoting any more of my time to Steve Kirsch after my response to his claim that “SARS-COV-2” has been isolated. It was clear to me after… Continue reading Is Purification of a “Virus” Necessary? Yes.
Since I state that there is no valid scientific evidence for the existence of “SARS-COV-2” nor any other “virus” running around causing disease, I am often asked “If it’s not a virus, then what is it making people sick?” To answer this, a few things must be understood first. For starters, not a single person… Continue reading The “Covid-19” and Air Pollution Connection
Is there a danger, in molecular biology, that the accumulation of data will get so far ahead of its assimilation into a conceptual framework that the data will eventually prove an encumbrance? Part of the trouble is that excitement of the chase leaves little time for reflection. And there are grants for producing data, but… Continue reading The Epistemological Crisis in Genomics
Most clinical specimens and tissue culture samples to be used for viral genome sequencing are usually contaminated with human cells, other microorganisms and naked DNA and RNA from disrupted cells. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2638583/ When talking about the proof for the existence of “viruses,” it is logical to require that the particles believed to be a “virus” are… Continue reading Genome Contamination: A Widespread Problem
One argument people try to make as proof of “viruses” is the existence of “viral” genomes. They believe that if a genome can be sequenced from unpurified cell culture soup where a “virus” is assumed to exist, that this is proof enough that a “virus” actually physically exists. Looking beyond the irony of claiming random… Continue reading How Accurate and Reliable are Genomes?
CDC guidance on masks has clearly stated that wearing a mask is intended to protect other people in case the mask wearer is infected. At no time has CDC guidance suggested that masks were intended to protect the wearers. -CDC https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/oct/15/tucker-carlson/tucker-carlson-distorts-new-cdc-report-makes-false/ Cloth masks are little more than facial decorations. There’s no place for them in… Continue reading Masks: What Does the Science Really Say?
Many people who believe “Covid-19” is a new disease caused by a novel “virus” tend to give the loss of smell (and taste) as a reason for this belief. They seem to think that this is the new symptom of disease which was not common before the arrival of “Covid-19.” This is most likely due… Continue reading Is Loss of Smell Specific to “Covid-19?”
According to the CDC: “In 1954, Thomas Weller used cell culture to isolate VZV from vesicular fluid of patients with varicella or zoster.” https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/varicella.html Taking the CDC at their not-so-trustworthy word, the ‘virus” responsible for both the chickenpox and shingles was not isolated until 1954. This means that any paper said to be working with… Continue reading Did Thomas Weller Isolate the Varicella-Zoster “Virus” in 1954?
Every once in a while, I’m fortunate enough to stumble upon an old paper that I imagine makes those trying to keep the lid shut on this virology scam cringe a bit when it’s brought up. These papers contain admittances and revelations by researchers that, if they were uttered by virologists today, would potentially blow… Continue reading Thomas Rivers Debunks Chickenpox in 1923
“I rely on expert opinions of people who I trust for certain issues like whether or not the virus has been “isolated.” It’s a reasonable approach if you are careful about which experts you trust.” -Steve Kirsch Trust the Experts? Throughout this Testing Pandemic, we have been hit with repeated mantras such as “Trust the… Continue reading Has the “Virus” Been Isolated? No.
“Incidentally, these tests furnish interesting information as to the portal of entry of the virus of varicella. The fact that the lymph from the vesicles, when applied to the broken skin or to the mucous membranes, led to no infection must cause us to consider this investigation from quite another standpoint. How are we to… Continue reading Chickenpox & Shingles: No Transmission
“Did you know? The same virus that causes chickenpox also causes shingles. Although shingles and chickenpox are caused by the same virus, they are not the same illness.” When looking into the history of virology, it becomes readily apparent that the same symptoms of disease are regularly given different names which are claimed to be… Continue reading Chickenpox & Shingles: A Confusing Tale About the Same Disease Caused by the Same “Virus” Yet Given Different Names
“If a lie is only printed often enough, it becomes a quasi-truth, and if such a truth is repeated often enough, it becomes an article of belief, a dogma, and men will die for it.” – From The Crown of Life by Isa Blagden Rudolf Steiner, an Austrian philosopher, esotericist, spiritualist, claimed clairvoyant, and the… Continue reading Did Rudolf Steiner Demonstrate Chickenpox Infectiousness in 1875?
On May 8th, 1980, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced the complete global eradication of the smallpox “virus.” This moment in time is considered one of the greatest success stories in all of modern medicine. Humanity had come together in a worldwide effort and finally conquered a deadly foe by utilizing the medical “miracle” of… Continue reading Was Smallpox Really Eradicated?
When it comes to symptoms of disease, fear has been a constant tool used by the medical cartel to sell young impressionable minds on the myths of “viruses” and contagiousness. A great example of this is found in smallpox. From a very young age, we were fed stories of how the pilgrims transferred the deadly… Continue reading Did William Heberden Distinguish Chickenpox From Smallpox in 1767?
With the dawn of a new year, we find ourselves facing the third straight annual “Covid-19” fear propaganda extravaganza. If you thought back at the beginning of 2021 that the emergence of the rushed experimental vaccines would eradicate this “virus,” you now realize you were horribly, horribly wrong and you should probably feel a bit… Continue reading What You Need to Know About “Covid-19” in 2022
“The new Omicron VOC currently poses a detection challenge for diagnostic laboratories. At the moment there is uncertainty in the diagnostic performance of the available PCR assays, as all information obtainable at this early stage is based on companies’ in silico evaluations. For many of the systems, hardly any real-world evidence is available yet.” https://smw.ch/article/doi/smw.2021.w30120 In order… Continue reading The PCR S Gene Dropout: Turning Failure Into A Positive
Just recently, the NFL did a sudden reexamination and update to its “Covid-19” testing protocols as far too many star players were testing positive and missing games. This obviously led to the games either having to be rescheduled or forfeited altogether which is a disaster for the ratings hungry league. According to the NFL, 94.6%… Continue reading How to Say No to PCR
I think it’s simple logic. It doesn’t require that anyone have any specialized knowledge of the field. The fact is that if there were evidence that HIV causes AIDS-if anyone who was in fact a specialist in that area could write a review of the literature, in which a number of scientific studies were cited… Continue reading Creating the “Coronavirus”
In 1967, it was claimed a new “Coronavirus” labelled OC43 was discovered and “isolated.” This was supposedly done through tissue cultures using tracheas from 5-9 month old aborted fetuses which were collected and stored in Hanks Salt Solution along with 10% fetal bovine serum as well as penicillin and streptomycin. Frgaments were partially covered in… Continue reading Creating the “Coronavirus” OC43 Genome
In order to generate an accurate genome of anything, that thing must be shown to exist in reality first. Regarding “viruses,” this means that the particles assumed to be “viruses” must be purified and isolated from everything else within the sample taken directly from a sick host. What is meant by purification and isolation? PURIFICATION:… Continue reading Creating the “Coronavirus” 229E Genome
Remember the horrendous MERS “Coronavirus” outbreak of 2012? Don’t feel bad if it doesn’t ring a bell as most people outside of Saudi Arabia remain unaware of it. This epidemic-that-never-was resulted in only 882 deaths associated with it globally. Apparently, the MERS “virus” didn’t like to travel as 804 of those deaths were in Saudi… Continue reading Zaki MERS “Coronavirus” Paper (2012)
In 2005, Patrick Woo claimed the discovery of another new “coronavirus” which he named HKU1. This was the third new human “coronavirus” identified since 2003 after 30 years of apparent hibernation with the discovery of the first two strains in the 1960’s. On top of the human “coronaviruses” popping up at the turn of the… Continue reading Woo “Coronavirus” HKU1 Paper (2005)
“I have the hypothesis that some viruses may be beneficial. I have no proof. It is only a hypothesis, simply because some viruses fail to be associated with disease, so these viruses may be beneficial, but this has not been investigated yet. Work on this topic is ongoing in my group.” -Lia Van Der Hoek The… Continue reading Van Der Hoek’s “Coronavirus” NL63 Paper (2004)
In 1968, a group of eight virologists sent word to Nature that they had all discovered similar (i.e. the same) particles from tissue and organ cultures in humans which resembled those in chickens and mice. The researchers relied on negative staining in electron microscopes and used several indirect methods such as complement fixation, neutralization tests,… Continue reading Naming The “Coronaviruses” (1968)
After his preliminary paper on the discovery of “IBV-like” particles, McIntosh went on to adapt the growth of his “virus” in suckling mouse brains and then to tissue cultures. McIntosh did so because he could not “grow” his “virus” using the standard tissue culture techniques and had to rely on organ cultures from aborted fetuses… Continue reading McIntosh “Coronavirus” OC43 Discovery Paper (1967)
In 1967, Kenneth McIntosh discovered what became considered the second strain of “Coronavirus” (after the red-headed step-child B814 was discarded to the historical waste bin) which was later named OC43. It is difficult to find out much backstory on the discovery process of OC43, which coincidentally happened to be discovered at the same exact time… Continue reading McIntosh “Coronavirus” OC43 Preliminary Paper (1967)
In 1967, June Almeida presented a paper supposedly showing the first EM images of the “coronavirus” structure. These images were published two years after D.A. Tyrrell discovered the B814 strain in 1965 and a year after Dorothy Hamre discovered strain 229E in 1966. The samples that Almeida used to characterize the previously unseen “viruses” were… Continue reading June Almeida And The First “Coronavirus” EM Images (1967)
In 1966, Dorothy Hamre “isolated” what she termed specimen 229E from tissue cultures using specimens from college students. She noticed what she said was distinct cytopathic changes (CPE) from known “viruses” and the results she obtained from indirect antibody testing led her to conclude it was a new respiratory “virus.” The 229E “virus” is now… Continue reading Hamre’s “Coronavirus” 229E Paper (1966)
This is the second paper by D.A. Tyrrell that is considered as preliminary evidence for the existence of human “coronaviruses.” Notice, as in his first paper from 1965, that once again there are numerous assumptions which are made, the least of which is that there is a “virus” present in the samples to begin with.… Continue reading D.A. Tyrrell’s 2nd “Coronavirus” Discovery Paper (1966)
If you want to truly understand the insane leaps in logic, the numerous assumptions, and the lack of evidence regarding any “virus,” you must always trace things back to the original source for the discovery of said “virus.” If the paper claiming the isolation of a novel “virus” is unable to actually show purification/isolation of… Continue reading D.A. Tyrrell’s “Coronavirus” Discovery Paper (1965)
I tend to stay away from acknowledging variants much as it should be clear since “SARS-COV-2” was never properly purified/isolated directly from a sick host and therefore never proven to exist, that the variants of this non-existent “virus” also do not exist. The hysteria is akin to being terrified of a Word document containing random… Continue reading The Variant Game: Fool Them Thrice…?
“There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.” -Mark Twain People seem to fail to realize that the antivaccination movement is not a new thing. In fact, it has been around as long as vaccination has been an idea. Obviously, most will not hear about the opposition to the “medical marvel” which… Continue reading Vaccination: Proved Useless And Dangerous (1889)
“Isolation and purification of a virus is necessary before a vaccine can be made.” The above statement came from the New York Times obituary of Wendell Meredith Stanley, considered by some to be the “Father of Virology.” While it is technically a correct statement, it really should read: Isolation and purification of the particles believed… Continue reading Further Proof The Influenza “Virus” Was Never Purified and Isolated
After “isolating” the influenza A “virus” in 1934 and supposedly “isolating” it again on tissue culture and egg membrane in 1937, Thomas Francis Jr. was back in 1940 to perform more grotesque serial passages of ground up chemically altered diseased animal tissue goo from one animal into another. He must have decided that the perfect… Continue reading Did Thomas Francis Jr. Isolate Influenza B in 1940?
When I originally started researching the origins of the supposed isolation of the influenza “virus,” I was not expecting to spend so much time on Thomas Francis Jr. It became evident, however, that throughout the early flu research of the 1930’s and 40’s, Francis Jr. was “Mr. Influenza.” It was also apparent that his research… Continue reading Thomas Francis Jr.’s Flu Review (1937)
In 1937, a few years after Smith, Andrewes, and Laidlaw supposedly isolated influenza A in 1933 and after Thomas Francis Jr. supposedly isolated it in 1934, Francis Jr. once again claimed to have the direct isolation of influenza A “virus,” this time in tissue culture medium and on an egg membrane. Or at least that… Continue reading Did Thomas Francis Jr. Isolate Influenza A in 1937?
“Epidemiology must constantly seek imaginative and ingenious teachers and scholars to create a new genre of medical ecologists who, with both the fine sensitivity of the scientific artist, and the broad perception of the community sculptor, can interpret the interplay of forces which result in disease.” —Thomas Francis, Jr. After the British trio of Smith,… Continue reading Did Thomas Francis Jr. Isolate Influenza A in 1934?
Two years after Richard Shope “discovered” that an invisible “virus” was the assumed cause of the swine flu in 1931, three other researchers decided to determine the “viral” cause of human influenza. These researchers were Wilson Smith, Christopher Andrewes, and Patrick Laidlaw. In order to determine the cause of influenza in humans, these brave researchers… Continue reading Was Influenza A Isolated in 1933?
Before the discovery of “viruses,” people believed that disease was caused by bacteria. There were rumblings and murmurs of invisible pathogens hidden within the fluids but most experiments were focused on cultivating bacteria from a diseased host and explaining pathogenesis based on the findings. This was no different for the flu. In 1892, German bacteriologist… Continue reading Richard Shope Swine Flu Paper (1931)
“Further limitations are that concomitant administration of BNT162b2 with other vaccines was not assessed, and cell-mediated responses to immunization are not yet available.” https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2116298 The above limitation of a recent Pfizer vaccine “safety” study for 5-11 year olds admitted that the safety of this vaccine, when used along with other vaccines, was not addressed. This… Continue reading The Serious Lack of Studies On The “Safety” of The Childhood Immunization Schedule
Study Responsibilities “Pfizer was responsible for study design and conduct; data collection, analysis, and interpretation; and writing of this manuscript. Both Pfizer and BioNTech manufactured the vaccine and placebo.BioNTech was the regulatory sponsor of the study and contributed to data interpretation and writing of the manuscript. All data were available to the authors, who vouch… Continue reading The Deadly Game of mRNA Russian Roulette With Our Children
“No, there is no such thing as a monoclonal antibody that, because it is monoclonal, recognizes only one protein or only one virus. It will bind to any protein having the same (or a very similar) sequence.” -Clifford Saper, one of the world’s leading authorities on monoclonal antibodies, Harvard Medical School professor https://off-guardian.org/2021/03/06/the-antibody-deception/ One of… Continue reading Antibody Specificity?
SEROCONVERSION: The development of detectable antibodies in the blood that are directed against an infectious agent. https://www.medicinenet.com/seroconversion/definition.htm Antibodies are supposed to be a sign that one has fought off an infection. These tiny unseen theoretical proteins are supposed to attach to the “virus” and clear it out of the body while leaving behind an army… Continue reading The Antibody Mess: Contradictions and Confusion
It is very important to understand that when the scientific community and the MSM talk about antibodies, they are speaking about particles never proven to exist. Like “viruses,” antibodies have never been purified/isolated directly from humans nor have they been EM imaged from completely purified samples where these tiny proteins are separated from everything else.… Continue reading Antibodies Are Not Required For Immunity
“Is this really about the vaccine or is it about something else?” -Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., M.S. is the discoverer of in-vitro and in-vivo RNA transfection and the inventor of mRNA gene therapy “vaccines,” while he was at the Salk Institute in 1988. It continues to amaze how, despite the numerous instances of criminality and… Continue reading The Uncharted Dangers of mRNA Vaccines
To find the answer to this question, it must first be understood that the disease known as Polio is nothing more than a collection of symptoms which have been given a name. These are the exact same symptoms of disease commonly seen with the flu as well as other ailments. The only “major difference” is… Continue reading Was Polio Conquered?
As a final nail in the coffin to the claims of purification/isolation of the Polio “virus,” for the “safety and effectiveness” of the Salk Polio vaccine, as well as the purification methods of Carlton Schwerdt (who it was later admitted only achieved purity of 10% of the “virus”), I present two studies from 1961, which… Continue reading Was Polio Ever Properly Purified and Isolated? Part Three
Exposing the lies of germ theory and virology using their own sources.
Copyright © 2026 All Right Reserved ViroLIEgy
Disclaimer: The information on this site is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice.
We are an awward winning multinational & company We believe in quality and standard worldwide company.
