Presented below are some of the highlights from an 18-page report by Jonas Salk that was provided as evidence for the successful vaccination against Polio. It is a rather long read so for editing purposes, information regarding the inactivation of “virus” by chemical means were edited out as well as some of the details on… Continue reading Salk’s Polio Vaccine Research Paper (1953)
“We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes.” Dr. Eric Rubin on the FDA panel deciding on whether to give the “SARS-COV-2” vaccines approval for 5-11-year-olds https://townhall.com/tipsheet/scottmorefield/2021/10/26/fda-panel-member-were-never-gonna-learn-about-how-safe-the-vaccine-is-until-we-start-giving-it-n2598090 “That’s just the way it goes.” Just accept it. We need to give ourselves and… Continue reading From Polio to “SARS-COV-2:” Repeating the Vaccine Mistakes of the Past
In 1959, Carlton Schwerdt wrote an in-depth review of the evidence which had been gathered up to that time in relation to the purification and isolation of a Polio “virus.” The paper itself is about 41 pages long and covers everything from the various attempts to achieve purification, the difficulties of “viral” idenfification/characterization by means… Continue reading Was Polio Ever Properly Purified and Isolated?: Part Two
In order to properly purify a “virus,”, the particles must be freed from anything that can contaminate, debase, adulterate, and/or pollute it. To be properly isolated, the particles must be separated from everything else that could potentially be contained within the sample. Without doing this, there would be no certainty that the particles from a… Continue reading Was Polio Ever Properly Purified and Isolated?: Part One
John Franklin Enders, the man responsible for the “isolation” of the Measles “virus” in 1954 using the cell culture process he supposedly perfected, was also heavily involved in Polio research. He was responsible for the cultivation of the Lansing Polio “virus” on non-nervous tissue culture experiments in 1949. Up to that time, Polio was only… Continue reading Enders Polio Paper (1949)
The Lansing strain of Polio is one of three strains used in the Polio vaccine. It was created through the emulsified brain and spinal cord of an 18-year-old boy from Lansing, MI. The emulsified goo was injected into the brains of monkeys which then had their brains and spinal cords emulsified and transferred into other… Continue reading The Lansing Strain of Polio
“What is now proved was once only imagin’d” –William Blake It’s kind of ironic that the above William Blake quote headlined the Rockefeller University’s Research Profile on Simon Flexner seeing how everything virology claims to have “proven” amounts to nothing but pure imagination. Simon Flexner, brother of Abraham Flexner of the infamous Flexner Report, was… Continue reading Flexner’s Polio Paper (1910)
When you look into the history of Polio, you will find that the “discovery” of the Polio “virus” is fraught with insane leaps in logic and assumptions and is replete with grotesquely inhumane experiments. You will find that initially, the spinal column from a deceased nine-year-old boy was ground up and injected directly into the… Continue reading A Brief Overview on the Horrors of Polio Research
It has been known since at least 2005 that much of the scientific literature being published is fundamentally flawed, non-reproducible, and/or outright fraudulent. Relating to the (pseudo)science of virology, this crisis extends to the cell culturing techniques used to “isolate” the “virus” as well as the theoretical antibodies used as an indirect method to identify… Continue reading The Reproducibility Crisis in Genomics
Over the last few decades, it has been shown that there is a huge reproducibility crisis going on in the sciences. This was brilliantly pointed out by John Ioannidis, a very well-respected physician/scientist and professor at Stanford, who concluded in a 2005 essay he wrote that most of the published scientific literature is wrong. One… Continue reading The Reproducibility Crisis in Antibody Research
ARTEFACTS (Genomics): “In genetics a result that does not represent the true biological material or function but arises from a technical, often artificial, process. Artefacts can lead to misleading results from sequencing. To avoid giving patients incorrect results during data analysis and validation, any data that could be an artefact from the sequencing process is thoroughly investigated.” Artefact… Continue reading “Virus” Variants or Sequencing Errors/Artefacts?
“It is obvious that Koch’s Postulates have not been satisfied in viral diseases.” -Thomas Rivers 1937 During the 2003 SARS “epidemic,” the WHO regularly announced updates about their search for the causative agent of what was claimed to be a new disease. On March 27th, 2003, they admitted that the criteria that needed to be… Continue reading Fouchier “SARS-COV-1” Paper (2003): Koch’s Postulates Fulfilled?
In 1884, German scientist Robert Koch devised a set of logic-based criteria that needed to be met in order to prove a specific pathogen caused a disease. By 1890, he had refined and published them. At the time, Koch’s criteria were developed for bacteria as “viruses” were unknown and were not officially “discovered” until 1892… Continue reading Thomas Rivers Revision of Koch’s Postulates (1937)
This is the final of the four papers used to claim that Koch’s Postulates (four logic-based criteria needed to be met in order to claim a pathogen causes disease), were fulfilled for “SARS-COV-1.” However, as in the other papers used to make this claim, the researchers fail at even fulfilling the first two Postulates. The… Continue reading Ksiazek “SARS-COV-1” Paper (2003)
The Poutanen study/report summarized the initial epidemiologic findings, clinical description, and diagnostic findings for the first probable cases of “SARS” in Canada. This paper was used along with three others as evidence that “SARS-COV-1” fulfilled Koch’s Postulates, a series of four logical requirements developed by Robert Koch in 1890 that were agreed upon by the… Continue reading Poutanen “SARS-COV-1” Paper (2003)
Christian Drosten, a German virologist who helped to create the problematic “SARS-COV-2” PCR test without ever actually seeing a “virus,” was also heavily involved in the original “SARS-COV-1” discovery process. In fact, Drosten was instrumental in setting up the molecular virology methods used today to claim the discovery of novel “viruses” based on genome sequences… Continue reading Drosten “SARS-COV-1” Paper (2003)
On November 16, 2002, the first case of an atypical pneumonia was reported in Guangdong province in the southern part of China. It wasn’t until nearly 4 months later on March 12th, 2003 that the WHO announced a global alert about a severe pneumonia affecting parts of Asia. On March 24th, 2003, a CDC laboratory… Continue reading J.S.M. Peiris “SARS-COV-1” Paper (2003)
How do virologists back up the various claims they make regarding “viruses” and their variants? Are the reports of increased virulence and transmissibility confirmed by the data? What valid scientific evidence supports the statements they make publicly? Is there any or are virologists jumping to conclusions that clearly are not justified? With all of this… Continue reading Virologists: Making Conclusions Not Justified by the Data
“Although all that is terrific, says Calisher, a string of DNA letters in a data bank tells little or nothing about how a virus multiplies, which animals carry it, how it makes people sick, or whether antibodies to other viruses might protect against it. Just studying sequences, Calisher says, is “like trying to say whether somebody has bad… Continue reading “Viral” Genomics: Nothing but Strings of Letters in a Data Bank
In July 2001, virologist Charles Calisher, along with 13 other illustrious names in virology, wrote an open letter published in the August/Sept issue of Emerging Infectious Disease. In it, they highlighted many of the concerns the “old guard” of virology had with the “new guard.” These virologists felt that the established tried and true methods… Continue reading The Old Guard of Virology Warn About the Ways of the New Guard and Their Molecular Toys
If you want more evidence that unproven theoretical antibody measurements are absolutely useless, it’s always fun to go directly to the accepted mainstream sources themselves. Many times, you can find very revealing nuggets of information buried within their releases. This information tends to contradict the claims they make publicly. Case in point, the claim that… Continue reading FDA and the CDC Destroy Antibody Testing and Immunity
“Neither an immune correlate of protection nor of the duration of protection has been established to date.” -WHO on “SARS-COV-2” vaccine immunity October 4th, 2021 https://www.who.int/news/item/04-10-2021-interim-statement-on-booster-doses-for-covid-19-vaccination In order for antibodies to have any usefulness as a measurement of protection, it must be established how many antibodies are needed for protection. This is supposedly determined by a… Continue reading Antibodies: No Correlation of Protection
“We do have tests to measure antibodies. In theory, you could even measure virus, neutralizing antibodies in a specialty lab, but that’s not easy to do in a high-throughput way. We do not have what we call a true correlate of protection. We do not have a blood test or even a series of blood… Continue reading Do Antibodies Equal Protection? They Don’t Know.
For those who believe HIV is a highly infectious “virus,” they’ve probably never seen Nancy Padian’s 1996 study which followed 176 discordant couples (1 HIV positive and the other negative) for 10 years. These couples regularly slept together and had unprotected sex. There were no HIV transmissions from the positive partner to the negative partner… Continue reading The Infectious Myth Busted Part 3: HIV Transmission Rare or Non-Existent?
“Our review found no human experimental studies published in the English-language literature delineating person-to-person transmission of influenza.“ https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/37/8/1094/2013282 When you look at the evidence (or lack thereof) throughout the last century, you find that not only has it been regularly shown that “viruses” can not be transmitted from human-to-human, virologists clearly have no idea how… Continue reading The Infectious Myth Busted Part 2: How are “Viruses” Transmitted? They don’t know.
Here is something you will never see in the mainstream news. During the 1918 Spanish Flu, which is considered to be the most contagious “virus” of all time, researchers for the Public Health Service and the U.S. Navy tried to determine what caused the flu and how infectious it truly was. However, the results of… Continue reading The Infectious Myth Busted Part 1: The Rosenau Spanish Flu Experiments (1918)
“Viral” load is a common measure that one often hears about from the CDC/WHO/MSM when discussing “Covid-19” and disease severity. It is considered an estimation of the amount of “virus” that is within a person’s body fluid. This is primarily determined through calculations based off the Cycle Threshold (Ct) Value from a PCR test. Virologists… Continue reading “Viral” Load of Crap
“WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.“ https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-2021-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users-2020-05… Continue reading PCR and the Prevalence Problem
The Infectious Disease Society of America and the Association for Molecular Pathology released a joint statement in March 2021 about the PCR Test Ct Values which has given even more reasons not to trust any PCR result for this or any other “pandemic.” Together, they inadvertently destroy any argument for the use of PCR as… Continue reading The IDSA and AMP Joint Statement Destroying PCR Tests
For those who don’t know how they determine someone positive for “Coronavirus” using the PCR test, it is not done with a binary + or – result like a pregnancy test. They determine positivity using an arbitrary (random) number called the Ct (cycle threshold) value. What is the Ct value? Ct Value: the number of… Continue reading PCR Ct Values: Arbitrary & Meaningless
John Franklin Enders 1954 paper is considered the definitive proof for the discovery of a measles “virus.” This evidence was presented as the “isolation” of measles and served as the basis for which the vaccine was built upon. It also laid the groundwork for the use of cell culture experiments as a way to cultivate… Continue reading Enders Measles Paper (1954)
In order to determine the pathogenicity of a “virus,” animal models must be employed to see if the supposed pathogen said to be hiding in the toxic cell culture soup actually causes the same disease in healthy animals as it does in humans. However, here we are nearly two years into this “pandemic” and they… Continue reading Where is the “SARS-COV-2” Animal Model???
In order to prove a new pathogenic “virus” exists, Koch’s Postulates must be satisfied first. They are four logic-based rules established by Robert Koch in 1890 and are considered the bare minimum requirements needed to be fulfilled in order to prove a microbe causes disease. Postulates 3 and 4, in particular, deal with the use… Continue reading Lack of “SARS-COV-2” Animal Models
“Since no animal model fully reproduces every aspect of COVID-19, it is necessary to weigh the strengths and weaknesses of each according to the goals of the study.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023231/#__ffn_sectitle The above statement from a June 2021 article on the status of animal models for “SARS-COV-2” showcases the giant glaring elephant in the room: to date,… Continue reading Non-Human Primate “SARS-COV-2” Animal Model Study (2020)
It is increasingly clear that purification of a “virus” is impossible. There are too many contaminants, variables, unknowns, and nanoparticles of similar shape/size to be able to say with certainty that the particles assumed to be a “virus” in a cell culture are the same ones imaged by TEM or for which the genome sequence… Continue reading The Purification Problem
When getting down to the size of nanoparticles and the expected billions of identical particles at that level, it would be logical to assume that completely separating the exact particle a virologist is looking for from everything else in the sample is downright impossible. Thus, asking virologists to completely purify and isolate the suspected “viral”… Continue reading Is Complete Purification/Isolation of a “Virus” Even Possible?
Isolation: the act of separating something from other things : the act of isolating something https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/isolation Above is the definition most people agree with and refer to when isolating something. Not virologists. This is what they mean when using the word isolation: “Viruses are basically inanimate objects which need a culture to activate in. But… Continue reading What Do Virologists Mean by Isolation?
“In Silico: in or on a computer : done or produced by using computer software or simulation“ https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/in%20silico I won’t go into too much detail regarding the Drosten PCR test as it was covered beautifully by people much better suited than I (linked below), but I would be remiss if I did not mention it… Continue reading Drosten “SARS-COV-2” PCR Paper
On March 7, 2020, the CDC released their study on the “isolation” and characterization of “SARS-COV-2” from the first US patient identified by PCR testing on January 22nd, 2020. As with every single paper before it, the CDC relies on unpurified cell cultures to claim “isolation” of a new “Coronavirus.” They utilize the same unproven… Continue reading CDC “SARS-COV-2” Paper (2020)
“We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.” -Replying Author: Wan Beom Park https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/ This paper is often cited by many as proof that “SARS-COV-2” exists and has been “isolated” from a sick patient. The problem is, they only read the title of the study. Had they read the study itself,… Continue reading Park “SARS-COV-2” Paper (2020)
“[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones.” -Replying Author: Wenjie Tan https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/ The Zhu study gets the infamous distinction for not only acknowledging that they did not fulfill Koch’s Postulates, the logic-based criteria needed to be met in order to prove a microorganism causes disease, but also for admitting that they… Continue reading Zhu “SARS-COV-2” Paper (2020)
It should be clear to anyone being intellectually honest that purification (free of foreign material, contaminants, pollutants, etc.) and isolation (separated from everything else) of particles believed to be a “virus” is essential and can not be skipped. Without separating the assumed “viral” particles from everything else in the sample, there is no way for… Continue reading Misinterpreting Electron Microscope Images
There are many subcellular structures that can be confused with “viruses” in TEM images. These consist of coated vesicles, multivesicular bodies, exosomes, golgi and costomer-coated vesicles, etc. These structures/particles are sure to be within the sample as virologists fail to properly purify (free of foreign matter, pollutants, contaminants, etc.) and isolate (separated from everything else)… Continue reading The Mimickers of “SARS-COV-2”
A huge problem for Virologists is that there is no way that they can claim what they present as evidence of a “virus” has any relation to natural particles that occur in vivo, or within a living organism. The various cell-altering chemicals/antibiotics and foreign animal RNA that is subsequently mixed together with the original unpurified… Continue reading The Numerous Alterations During Sample Preparation for EM Imaging
One of the “proofs” people try to offer in support of “SARS-COV-2” or any other “virus” is that pictures of these particles exist. They assume that since we can see images of these “viruses,” this means that they must be real. The images referred to are normally Transmission Electron Microscope images taken from cell cultures.… Continue reading Electron Microscope Imagery: “Virus” Proof or Refutation?
A picture is worth a thousand words, right? That’s what virologists would love for you to believe when it comes to their beautifully hand-crafted and digitally enhanced Electron Microscope images of particles claimed to be “viruses.” However, to understand the trickery involved in Virology, one must understand that there are billions of similar looking particles… Continue reading “Viruses” or Exosomes?
It is clear after having gone through the history of “Coronaviruses” from 1965 up to today, not a single one of these so-called “viruses” has ever been properly purified/isolated directly from a sick patient nor proven pathogenic by fulfilling Koch’s Postulates. They always take the fluid from a sick patient and mix it with animal… Continue reading Zhou “SARS-COV-2” Paper (2020)
The natural origin of “SARS-COV-2,” a “virus” which has never been properly purified/isolated nor proven pathogenic, relies heavily on its zoonotic roots to its closest relative RatG13, a bat “coronavirus.” However, there are serious issues with this theory. The existence of this bat “virus” is highly questionable as its sequence mysteriously appeared around the same… Continue reading The Mysterious Animal Origin of “SARS-COV-2” Part 1: Bats
When sequencing the genome of an organism, many short segments of DNA are created using technology such as the Illumina program. This makes the process pf creating the genome fast and cheap. However, a rather challenging problem is that there is no information on how to put the many short segments of DNA back together… Continue reading “SARS-COV-2” and the Slippery Slope of Reference Genomics
“In order to verify and determine the presence of a virus, and following the most fundamental rules of scientific reasoning, the virus needs to be isolated and displayed in its pure form in order to rule out that cellular genetic sequences are misinterpreted as components of a virus.” -Ex-Virologist Dr. Stefan Lanka If one were… Continue reading Creating the “SARS-COV-2” Genome
Exposing the lies of germ theory and virology using their own sources.
Copyright © 2026 All Right Reserved ViroLIEgy
Disclaimer: The information on this site is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice.
We are an awward winning multinational & company We believe in quality and standard worldwide company.
